University of Cambridge
Dual regulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate
Abstract
dc:description.abstractCa<sup>2+</sup> is a universal and effective intracellular messenger, which holds a central role in the regulation of a vast array of cellular processes. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP<sub>3</sub>Rs) are key signal integrators, which transform extracellular stimuli into intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> signals. Only immobilised IP<sub>3</sub>Rs, licensed by association with KRas-induced actin-interacting protein (KRAP), can respond through IP<sub>3</sub>-mediated Ca<sup>2+</sup> release. These licensed IP<sub>3</sub>Rs are tethered on actin near membrane contact sites (MCS) between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and plasma membrane (PM), where store-operated Ca<sup>2+</sup> entry (SOCE) takes place. Uncovering the mechanisms that govern IP<sub>3</sub>R regulation is an essential element in understanding the spatial and temporal patterns of Ca<sup>2+</sup> signalling. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>) is a minor, but functionally diverse lipid at the PM. In the canonical Ca<sup>2+</sup> signalling cascade, activation of PM-resident receptors such as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) causes phospholipase C (PLC) to hydrolyse PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>, producing inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP<sub>3</sub>) which diffuses through the cytoplasm to IP<sub>3</sub>Rs, enabling Ca<sup>2+</sup> release from the ER. The stimulus intensity governs the amount of IP<sub>3</sub> produced and in consequence, the extent of IP<sub>3</sub>R activation, starting from brief, localised Ca<sup>2+</sup> puffs, and progressing to cell-wide global Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves. Tight control of the transition from local to global Ca<sup>2+</sup> signals is central to the downstream consequences of receptor activation. PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>, with its essential roles in F-actin nucleation and formation of the SOCE complex at ER-PM MCS, is thus a potential regulator of IP<sub>3</sub>R activity in addition to its role in providing IP<sub>3</sub>. Towards exploring possible additional roles of PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> in regulating Ca<sup>2+</sup> signalling via IP<sub>3</sub>Rs, I have assessed three strategies for selective depletion of PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> at the PM: pharmacological inhibition of the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI(4)P), the precursor of PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>, gene silencing of the 5-kinases that convert PI(4)P to PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>, and expression of a rapamycin-inducible heterodimerization system that allows translocation of a PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>-specific 5-phosphatase (herein referred to as the ‘’5-PTASE system’’) to the PM. Pharmacological or siRNA-mediated inhibition of the relevant kinases in the PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> metabolic cycle did not successfully attenuate Ca<sup>2+</sup> signals in response to histamine in HeLa cells, suggesting that PLC-sensitive PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> pools remain available after treatment. On the contrary, I have shown that the 5-PTASE system caused global depletion of PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> at the PM using a genetically encoded, PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>-selective fluorescent sensor, and showed that Ca<sup>2+</sup> signals in response to histamine in HeLa cells were attenuated. The method thereby allows acute and near-complete depletion of PM-associated PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>. Using the validated 5-PTASE system for PM PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> depletion, and uniform delivery of i-IP<sub>3</sub> to the cytosol via uncaging of the exogenously supplied photolabile caged ci-IP<sub>3</sub>, revealed that PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> depletion significantly reduced the frequency of Ca<sup>2+</sup> puffs in HeLa and HEK293 cells without affecting puff amplitude or kinetics. PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> regulation was confirmed to extend to all three IP<sub>3</sub>R subtypes. As PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> depletion may lead to reduction of basal IP<sub>3</sub> levels, I employed two complementary approaches to assess whether a loss of basal IP<sub>3</sub> is responsible for the reduced Ca<sup>2+</sup> puff frequency. Reducing basal IP<sub>3</sub> levels by inhibiting PLC activity with U73122 or by overexpressing cytosolic IP<sub>3</sub> kinase C (IP<sub>3</sub>KC) did not reduce the frequency of Ca<sup>2+</sup> puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP<sub>3</sub>. I conclude that PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> regulates IP<sub>3</sub>R activity in parallel to providing IP<sub>3</sub>. As PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> levels at the PM are dynamically controlled during signalling when PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> is consumed to produce IP<sub>3</sub>, I developed methods to uncouple stimulation of GPCRs that evoke IP<sub>3</sub> formation from delivery of IP<sub>3</sub> to IP<sub>3</sub>Rs while retaining opportunities to stimulate IP<sub>3</sub>Rs directly. I expressed IP<sub>3</sub>KC to intercept endogenous IP<sub>3</sub> and photolyzed ci-IP<sub>3</sub> to enable independent activation of GPCRs and delivery of i-IP<sub>3</sub> to IP<sub>3</sub>Rs. Activation of H1 receptors in HeLa cells or M3 muscarinic receptors in HEK293 cells in the presence of IP<sub>3</sub>KC reduced the frequency of Ca<sup>2+</sup> puffs evoked exogenously by photolysis of ci-IP<sub>3</sub> without affecting puff amplitude or kinetics. This inhibition was entirely mediated by PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> depletion. PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> depletion significantly reduced the likelihood of Ca<sup>2+</sup> puffs progressing to a global Ca<sup>2+</sup> signal, but once the transition threshold was reached, the amplitude of the global signal was indistinguishable in the presence and absence of PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>. PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> depletion did not affect the subcellular distribution of IP<sub>3</sub>Rs. I suggest that PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> primes IP<sub>3</sub>Rs to respond to IP<sub>3</sub> by partially occupying the receptor’s IP<sub>3</sub>-binding site. Increasing PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> levels in the PM did not further activate IP<sub>3</sub>Rs, suggesting that basal PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> achieves the maximal effect. It is unclear whether this occurs with all IP<sub>3</sub>-binding sites occupied by PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> or whether physical barriers constrain the number of sites that can be occupied. My results establish that PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> primes IP<sub>3</sub>Rs to respond, and that as GPCRs stimulate IP<sub>3</sub> formation they also deplete PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub>, relieving this priming stimulus and resetting IP<sub>3</sub>R sensitivity. Dual regulation of IP<sub>3</sub>Rs by PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> and IP<sub>3</sub> through GPCRs thus controls the transition from local to global Ca<sup>2+</sup> signals.
Degree
thesis:*- Name dc:type.qualificationname
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
- Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
- Doctoral
- Grantor dc:publisher.institution
- University of Cambridge
- Year dc:date.issued
- 2024
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Ivanova, Adelina Adelin
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Ladds, Graham
Subjects
dc:subject × 6Rights
dc:rightsIdentifiers
dc:identifier.*- DOI dc:identifier.doi
- https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.112415
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/374317