Re-examining the implications of systems thinking for evaluation

Over the last twenty years, many prominent evaluators have been borrowing and using ideas, theories, and methods from the systems and complexity fields with little research on the implications of this trend for the evaluation field. This thesis examines this borrowing to identify over-arching implications for evaluation theory and practice. The first paper reviews inter-disciplinary literature on systems thinking and complexity science with regards to evaluating social policies and programs and identifies major implications for how evaluators theorize evaluation practice. The second paper reports on an analysis of eight cases of evaluation practice that use systems and complexity ideas and techniques and presents findings regarding how evaluators conceive of and practice evaluation. The third paper advances an argument for how evaluators can use critical systems heuristics to surface, reflect on, and make explicit the values that influence and should influence an evaluation. Collectively, these papers support the potential of borrowing from the systems and complexity fields to expand on and re-define evaluation theory and practice.

Name thesis:degree_name

Ph.D.

Level thesis:degree_level

Dissertation

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Educational Psychology

Grantor

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Year dc:date

2016

Author dc:creator

• Gates, Emily F

Contributors dc:contributor

• Schwandt, Thomas A.
• Greene, Jennifer C.
• DeStefano, Lizanne
• Reynolds, Martin

• evaluation, systems thinking, complexity science, critical systems heuristics, values

Statement dc:rights

• Copyright 2016 Emily Gates

Language dc:language

en

Handle dc:identifier

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90530

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90530