{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90530"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90530","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Re-examining the implications of systems thinking for evaluation","abstract":"Over the last twenty years, many prominent evaluators have been borrowing and using ideas, theories, and methods from the systems and complexity fields with little research on the implications of this trend for the evaluation field. This thesis examines this borrowing to identify over-arching implications for evaluation theory and practice. The first paper reviews inter-disciplinary literature on systems thinking and complexity science with regards to evaluating social policies and programs and identifies major implications for how evaluators theorize evaluation practice. The second paper reports on an analysis of eight cases of evaluation practice that use systems and complexity ideas and techniques and presents findings regarding how evaluators conceive of and practice evaluation. The third paper advances an argument for how evaluators can use critical systems heuristics to surface, reflect on, and make explicit the values that influence and should influence an evaluation. Collectively, these papers support the potential of borrowing from the systems and complexity fields to expand on and re-define evaluation theory and practice.","abstract_html":"Over the last twenty years, many prominent evaluators have been borrowing and using ideas, theories, and methods from the systems and complexity fields with little research on the implications of this trend for the evaluation field. This thesis examines this borrowing to identify over-arching implications for evaluation theory and practice. The first paper reviews inter-disciplinary literature on systems thinking and complexity science with regards to evaluating social policies and programs and identifies major implications for how evaluators theorize evaluation practice. The second paper reports on an analysis of eight cases of evaluation practice that use systems and complexity ideas and techniques and presents findings regarding how evaluators conceive of and practice evaluation. The third paper advances an argument for how evaluators can use critical systems heuristics to surface, reflect on, and make explicit the values that influence and should influence an evaluation. Collectively, these papers support the potential of borrowing from the systems and complexity fields to expand on and re-define evaluation theory and practice.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gates, Emily F"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Schwandt, Thomas A.","Greene, Jennifer C.","DeStefano, Lizanne","Reynolds, Martin"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-07-07T19:53:43Z","date_published":"2016-07-07T19:53:43Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:32Z","subjects":["evaluation, systems thinking, complexity science, critical systems heuristics, values"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Emily Gates"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90530","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Schwandt, Thomas A.","Greene, Jennifer C.","DeStefano, Lizanne","Reynolds, Martin"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gates, Emily F"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-07-07T19:53:43Z","2016-04-14","2016-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["evaluation, systems thinking, complexity science, critical systems heuristics, values"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Emily Gates"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90530"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Over the last twenty years, many prominent evaluators have been borrowing and using ideas, theories, and methods from the systems and complexity fields with little research on the implications of this trend for the evaluation field. This thesis examines this borrowing to identify over-arching implications for evaluation theory and practice. The first paper reviews inter-disciplinary literature on systems thinking and complexity science with regards to evaluating social policies and programs and identifies major implications for how evaluators theorize evaluation practice. The second paper reports on an analysis of eight cases of evaluation practice that use systems and complexity ideas and techniques and presents findings regarding how evaluators conceive of and practice evaluation. The third paper advances an argument for how evaluators can use critical systems heuristics to surface, reflect on, and make explicit the values that influence and should influence an evaluation. Collectively, these papers support the potential of borrowing from the systems and complexity fields to expand on and re-define evaluation theory and practice.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Gates, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-13 at 11:21.","The student, Emily Gates, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-04-13 at 11:36.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-04-14 at 13:44.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9201 on 2016-07-07 at 13:30:00","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:53:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 GATES-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 836661 bytes, checksum: 00c7f73f6968e04e49d45bdfbcf9cbcb (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: ee1833e1f3e727bfbf663ac94440c6c5 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4554 bytes, checksum: d28defc491e27edaf7aec1115d71f299 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-14"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Re-examining the implications of systems thinking for evaluation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Schwandt, Thomas A.","Greene, Jennifer C.","DeStefano, Lizanne","Reynolds, Martin"],"dc:creator":["Gates, Emily F"],"dc:date":["2016-07-07T19:53:43Z","2016-04-14","2016-05"],"dc:description":["Over the last twenty years, many prominent evaluators have been borrowing and using ideas, theories, and methods from the systems and complexity fields with little research on the implications of this trend for the evaluation field. This thesis examines this borrowing to identify over-arching implications for evaluation theory and practice. The first paper reviews inter-disciplinary literature on systems thinking and complexity science with regards to evaluating social policies and programs and identifies major implications for how evaluators theorize evaluation practice. The second paper reports on an analysis of eight cases of evaluation practice that use systems and complexity ideas and techniques and presents findings regarding how evaluators conceive of and practice evaluation. The third paper advances an argument for how evaluators can use critical systems heuristics to surface, reflect on, and make explicit the values that influence and should influence an evaluation. Collectively, these papers support the potential of borrowing from the systems and complexity fields to expand on and re-define evaluation theory and practice.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Gates, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-13 at 11:21.","The student, Emily Gates, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-04-13 at 11:36.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-04-14 at 13:44.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9201 on 2016-07-07 at 13:30:00","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:53:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 GATES-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 836661 bytes, checksum: 00c7f73f6968e04e49d45bdfbcf9cbcb (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: ee1833e1f3e727bfbf663ac94440c6c5 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4554 bytes, checksum: d28defc491e27edaf7aec1115d71f299 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-14"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90530"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Emily Gates"],"dc:subject":["evaluation, systems thinking, complexity science, critical systems heuristics, values"],"dc:title":["Re-examining the implications of systems thinking for evaluation"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:32Z"}