University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
The Effects of Different Styles of Interaction on the Learning of Evolutionary Theories
Abstract
dc:descriptionAnalyses of the Pre- and the Posttest performance and discussion processes in the Interaction session revealed the following. First, the Guiding style and the Mutual Constructive style enhanced the acquisition of the scientific evolutionary conceptual framework more effectively than the Conflicting style. However, some students in the Conflicting style also grasped the scientific evolutionary framework, and many students reconstructed their theories of evolution through discussion, even if the frameworks remained scientifically inappropriate. Second, the students who discussed evolution in the Conflicting style and the Mutual Constructive style tended to become more reflective and flexible than the students in the Guiding style, when solving a new evolutionary problem. Third, analyses of epistemological beliefs and critiques of evolutionary explanations suggested that the Mutual Constructive style and the Conflicting style facilitated the development of critical thinking more than the Guiding style.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Ph.D.
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Education
- Grantor
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Year dc:date
- 2015
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Sugimoto, Akiko
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Anderson, Richard C.
Subjects
dc:subject × 1Rights
- Language dc:language
- eng
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Identifier
- (MiAaPQ)AAI9921743
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80309