{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80309"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80309","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Effects of Different Styles of Interaction on the Learning of Evolutionary Theories","abstract":"Analyses of the Pre- and the Posttest performance and discussion processes in the Interaction session revealed the following. First, the Guiding style and the Mutual Constructive style enhanced the acquisition of the scientific evolutionary conceptual framework more effectively than the Conflicting style. However, some students in the Conflicting style also grasped the scientific evolutionary framework, and many students reconstructed their theories of evolution through discussion, even if the frameworks remained scientifically inappropriate. Second, the students who discussed evolution in the Conflicting style and the Mutual Constructive style tended to become more reflective and flexible than the students in the Guiding style, when solving a new evolutionary problem. Third, analyses of epistemological beliefs and critiques of evolutionary explanations suggested that the Mutual Constructive style and the Conflicting style facilitated the development of critical thinking more than the Guiding style.","abstract_html":"Analyses of the Pre- and the Posttest performance and discussion processes in the Interaction session revealed the following. First, the Guiding style and the Mutual Constructive style enhanced the acquisition of the scientific evolutionary conceptual framework more effectively than the Conflicting style. However, some students in the Conflicting style also grasped the scientific evolutionary framework, and many students reconstructed their theories of evolution through discussion, even if the frameworks remained scientifically inappropriate. Second, the students who discussed evolution in the Conflicting style and the Mutual Constructive style tended to become more reflective and flexible than the students in the Guiding style, when solving a new evolutionary problem. Third, analyses of epistemological beliefs and critiques of evolutionary explanations suggested that the Mutual Constructive style and the Conflicting style facilitated the development of critical thinking more than the Guiding style.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sugimoto, Akiko"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Anderson, Richard C."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T19:56:28Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T19:56:28Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:14Z","subjects":["Education, Higher"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9921743"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9921743","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80309","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Anderson, Richard C."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sugimoto, Akiko"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T19:56:28Z","10000-01-01","1999"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Higher"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80309","(MiAaPQ)AAI9921743"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Analyses of the Pre- and the Posttest performance and discussion processes in the Interaction session revealed the following. First, the Guiding style and the Mutual Constructive style enhanced the acquisition of the scientific evolutionary conceptual framework more effectively than the Conflicting style. However, some students in the Conflicting style also grasped the scientific evolutionary framework, and many students reconstructed their theories of evolution through discussion, even if the frameworks remained scientifically inappropriate. Second, the students who discussed evolution in the Conflicting style and the Mutual Constructive style tended to become more reflective and flexible than the students in the Guiding style, when solving a new evolutionary problem. Third, analyses of epistemological beliefs and critiques of evolutionary explanations suggested that the Mutual Constructive style and the Conflicting style facilitated the development of critical thinking more than the Guiding style.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:56:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9921743.pdf: 5415719 bytes, checksum: c6f53ed5d8b1684792f96bf2f7631ff7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81591 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","163 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effects of Different Styles of Interaction on the Learning of Evolutionary Theories"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Anderson, Richard C."],"dc:creator":["Sugimoto, Akiko"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T19:56:28Z","10000-01-01","1999"],"dc:description":["Analyses of the Pre- and the Posttest performance and discussion processes in the Interaction session revealed the following. First, the Guiding style and the Mutual Constructive style enhanced the acquisition of the scientific evolutionary conceptual framework more effectively than the Conflicting style. However, some students in the Conflicting style also grasped the scientific evolutionary framework, and many students reconstructed their theories of evolution through discussion, even if the frameworks remained scientifically inappropriate. Second, the students who discussed evolution in the Conflicting style and the Mutual Constructive style tended to become more reflective and flexible than the students in the Guiding style, when solving a new evolutionary problem. Third, analyses of epistemological beliefs and critiques of evolutionary explanations suggested that the Mutual Constructive style and the Conflicting style facilitated the development of critical thinking more than the Guiding style.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:56:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9921743.pdf: 5415719 bytes, checksum: c6f53ed5d8b1684792f96bf2f7631ff7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81591 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","163 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80309","(MiAaPQ)AAI9921743"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Education, Higher"],"dc:title":["The Effects of Different Styles of Interaction on the Learning of Evolutionary Theories"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:14Z"}