Back to search

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Adaptive moral character judgments: comparing memory and decision bias for immoral and moral targets

Abstract

dc:description

Evaluating others’ moral characteristics is a fundamental interpersonal process, since failing to accurately evaluate others’ morality can have profound consequences on one’s social life, and accordingly, survival. Therefore, it is likely that people exhibit adaptive cognitive tendencies when processing information about others’ moral character, and that these tendencies help people thrive in their social worlds. Consistent with this, prior research has shown that people have a better memory for targets described in morally relevant (vs. morally irrelevant) ways. However, findings diverge on whether targets described as immoral (vs. moral) are more memorable. The first aim of this dissertation is to compare memory for targets whose character is described as moral or immoral using cognitive modeling methods that better capture memory accuracy relative to previous methods. A second goal is to investigate people’s tendency to make memory errors about moral character, as this can provide additional insight into the adaptive structure of cognition. Given that humans adjust their decision-making to minimize costly errors, this dissertation additionally examines whether people exhibit systematic biases toward recalling previously presented social targets as moral or immoral. To examine these questions related to memory and bias in memory tests, memory and bias parameters for moral and immoral targets were computed using decision-tree (Study 1) and signal-detection methods (Study 2). Across the two studies, memory was enhanced for immoral relative to moral targets, and there was a bias to judge targets as moral rather than immoral. Study 2 also examined two potential mechanisms for decision bias—the belief that people are generally good, and the perceived social costs associated with falsely accusing others of immorality. However, these mechanisms were not supported. Overall, these findings support the argument that moral character judgment involving memory is adaptive.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Psychology
Grantor
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2025

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Han, Da Eun
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Laurent, Sean M.
  • Cohen, Dov
  • Stern, Chadly D.
  • Sanchez, Carmen
  • Cervantes, Víctor H.

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright 2025 Da Eun Han
Language dc:language
en, eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/130209

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Han, Da Eun. Adaptive moral character judgments: comparing memory and decision bias for immoral and moral targets. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 2025. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/130209