Back to results

Chapman University

Assessing the Efficacy of Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Enrichment Broths for Detection of <em>Salmonella</em> spp. in Meat Analogs

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>Plant-based meat alternatives are gaining popularity as the number of market options increases. However, the recent appearance of these products on the market post-dates the validation of the current approach for isolating <em>Salmonella</em> from meat analogs. Therefore, the objective<strong> </strong>of this study was to compare the efficacy of the currently used Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) pre-enrichment broth (lactose broth) with two additional broths (universal pre-enrichment broth and buffered peptone water) for the detection of <em>Salmonella</em> in five plant-based burger products. Each burger product was spiked with a <em>Salmonella</em> serotype (<em>S.</em> Enteritidis or <em>S. </em>Agona) that has previously been linked to one or more of the protein sources in the product. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Matrix Extension Verification Procedure section 5.1.1 was followed for the verification of each broth. Seven replicates of each of the five selected plant-protein burgers were spot-inoculated with 30 or less colony-forming units (CFU) of <em>Salmonella enterica </em>per 25 g of product and enriched in each broth. An additional seven non-inoculated replicates were tested with all broths. Pathogen recovery was evaluated using the methods described in BAM and <em>Salmonella</em> was confirmed with real-time PCR, using two DNA templates per sample. Comparison of the number of positive real-time PCR detections for <em>Salmonella</em> across all three broths and five brands indicated no significant difference (p-value > 0.05) between the effectiveness of each broth. The greatest level of detection was found with LB, in which 95.71% of DNA templates tested positive for <em>Salmonella</em>, followed by BPW and UP broth, which each had an 88.57% detection rate. When the broths were compared for effectiveness in each product separately, LB showed a significantly greater percentage of positive detections (92.86%) in Beyond Meat<sup>TM</sup> samples compared to UP (50%). However, none of the other products showed significant differences in detection among the three broths. In conclusion, the findings demonstrate that LB, the current BAM pre-enrichment broth, is an effective pre-enrichment for the detection of <em>Salmonella </em>in meat analogs formulated with various plant-proteins.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science (MS)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Food Science
Year dc:date.available
2021

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Sampson, Georgia
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Rosalee Hellberg
  • Anuradha Prakash
  • Lilian Were

Subjects

dc:subject × 8

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digitalcommons.chapman.edu:food_science_theses-1021

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Chapman University
Base URL
digitalcommons.chapman.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Sampson, Georgia. Assessing the Efficacy of Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Enrichment Broths for Detection of <em>Salmonella</em> spp. in Meat Analogs. Thesis thesis, 2021. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/food_science_theses/21