Back to results

Western Kentucky University

Labels for Anchors: The Good, the Bad, and the Endpoints

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This study was designed to determine if any differences in internal consistency existed between different designs of scale anchors. The three different designs explored were properly designed scales, improperly designed scales, and endpoint only scales. Two-Hundred and thirty-five participants rated the frequency of which they performed various computer activities on a survey using one of the three different designs. Contrary to expectations, internal consistency did not differ across the three designs.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Arts
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Department of Psychology
Year
2010

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Hellrung II, James Lee
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Dr. Reagan Brown (Directory), Dr. Elizabeth Shoenfelt, Dr. Tony Paquin

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/156
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digitalcommons.wku.edu:theses-1160

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Western Kentucky University
Base URL
digitalcommons.wku.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Hellrung II, James Lee. Labels for Anchors: The Good, the Bad, and the Endpoints. 2010. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/156