Back to results

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Comparative analysis of irrational beliefs and alexithymia to predict anxiety, neuroticism, and depression

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Anxiety, neuroticism and depression are highly studied human disturbances in the field of psychology. There are many theories as to the cause of these distresses. Followers of Albert Ellis' Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy have hypothesized that the maintaining of irrational beliefs causes emotional distress. Others have theorized that a condition known as alexithymia is responsible for emotional distresses. Literally "no words for feelings," alexithymia is a condition where individuals are unable to describe their feelings, they are unable to distinguish between their feelings and bodily sensations, and they have a tendency to overemphasize the concrete details of external events. This project was conducted to compare the two theories and to determine whether they worked together to best predict the emotional distresses, or if one theory was superior to the other. Several self-report questionnaires were administered to college students. These questionnaires included the Survey of Personal Beliefs, the MalouffSchutte Belief Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS - 20), the Beck Depression Inventory, the neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that an TAS - 20 subscale, Difficulty Identifying Feelings, was an especially important predictor of all emotional dysfunction measures. The irrational belief constructs were not as important in explaining variance in anxiety, depression, and neuroticism. These data had a number of implications about attempts to relate irrational beliefs to emotional disturbance, about the scales used to measure irrational beliefs, and about the use of alexithymia to predict emotional disturbance.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Culhane, Scott Edward
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Watson, Paul J.
  • College of Arts and Sciences

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
English, eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
LB2369.2 .C843 2000
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2079

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Tennessee - Chattanooga
Base URL
scholar.utc.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Culhane, Scott Edward. Comparative analysis of irrational beliefs and alexithymia to predict anxiety, neuroticism, and depression. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/900