{"id":{"repo_id":"utc","oai_identifier":"oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2079"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/utc/oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2079","repository":{"repo_id":"utc","name":"University of Tennessee - Chattanooga","base_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Comparative analysis of irrational beliefs and alexithymia to predict anxiety, neuroticism, and depression","abstract":"Anxiety, neuroticism and depression are highly studied human disturbances in the field of psychology. There are many theories as to the cause of these distresses. Followers of Albert Ellis' Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy have hypothesized that the maintaining of irrational beliefs causes emotional distress. Others have theorized that a condition known as alexithymia is responsible for emotional distresses. Literally \"no words for feelings,\" alexithymia is a condition where individuals are unable to describe their feelings, they are unable to distinguish between their feelings and bodily sensations, and they have a tendency to overemphasize the concrete details of external events. This project was conducted to compare the two theories and to determine whether they worked together to best predict the emotional distresses, or if one theory was superior to the other. Several self-report questionnaires were administered to college students. These questionnaires included the Survey of Personal Beliefs, the MalouffSchutte Belief Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS - 20), the Beck Depression Inventory, the neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that an TAS - 20 subscale, Difficulty Identifying Feelings, was an especially important predictor of all emotional dysfunction measures. The irrational belief constructs were not as important in explaining variance in anxiety, depression, and neuroticism. These data had a number of implications about attempts to relate irrational beliefs to emotional disturbance, about the scales used to measure irrational beliefs, and about the use of alexithymia to predict emotional disturbance.","abstract_html":"Anxiety, neuroticism and depression are highly studied human disturbances in the field of psychology. There are many theories as to the cause of these distresses. Followers of Albert Ellis' Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy have hypothesized that the maintaining of irrational beliefs causes emotional distress. Others have theorized that a condition known as alexithymia is responsible for emotional distresses. Literally "no words for feelings," alexithymia is a condition where individuals are unable to describe their feelings, they are unable to distinguish between their feelings and bodily sensations, and they have a tendency to overemphasize the concrete details of external events. This project was conducted to compare the two theories and to determine whether they worked together to best predict the emotional distresses, or if one theory was superior to the other. Several self-report questionnaires were administered to college students. These questionnaires included the Survey of Personal Beliefs, the MalouffSchutte Belief Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS - 20), the Beck Depression Inventory, the neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that an TAS - 20 subscale, Difficulty Identifying Feelings, was an especially important predictor of all emotional dysfunction measures. The irrational belief constructs were not as important in explaining variance in anxiety, depression, and neuroticism. These data had a number of implications about attempts to relate irrational beliefs to emotional disturbance, about the scales used to measure irrational beliefs, and about the use of alexithymia to predict emotional disturbance.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Culhane, Scott Edward"],"institution":"University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Watson, Paul J.","College of Arts and Sciences"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"","date_published":null,"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:13Z","subjects":["Alexithymia","Emotions--Health aspects","Neuroticism","Anxiety disorders","Depression, Mental"],"languages":["English","eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["LB2369.2 .C843 2000"],"render_values":[{"text":"LB2369.2 .C843 2000","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/900","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Watson, Paul J.","College of Arts and Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Culhane, Scott Edward"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2000-05-01T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Masters theses","Text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Alexithymia","Emotions--Health aspects","Neuroticism","Anxiety disorders","Depression, Mental"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["LB2369.2 .C843 2000","https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/900"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Dept. of Psychology","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Anxiety, neuroticism and depression are highly studied human disturbances in the field of psychology. There are many theories as to the cause of these distresses. Followers of Albert Ellis' Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy have hypothesized that the maintaining of irrational beliefs causes emotional distress. Others have theorized that a condition known as alexithymia is responsible for emotional distresses. Literally \"no words for feelings,\" alexithymia is a condition where individuals are unable to describe their feelings, they are unable to distinguish between their feelings and bodily sensations, and they have a tendency to overemphasize the concrete details of external events. This project was conducted to compare the two theories and to determine whether they worked together to best predict the emotional distresses, or if one theory was superior to the other. Several self-report questionnaires were administered to college students. These questionnaires included the Survey of Personal Beliefs, the MalouffSchutte Belief Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS - 20), the Beck Depression Inventory, the neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that an TAS - 20 subscale, Difficulty Identifying Feelings, was an especially important predictor of all emotional dysfunction measures. The irrational belief constructs were not as important in explaining variance in anxiety, depression, and neuroticism. These data had a number of implications about attempts to relate irrational beliefs to emotional disturbance, about the scales used to measure irrational beliefs, and about the use of alexithymia to predict emotional disturbance."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparative analysis of irrational beliefs and alexithymia to predict anxiety, neuroticism, and depression"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Watson, Paul J.","College of Arts and Sciences"],"dc:creator":["Culhane, Scott Edward"],"dc:date":["2000-05-01T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description":["Dept. of Psychology","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."],"dc:description.abstract":["Anxiety, neuroticism and depression are highly studied human disturbances in the field of psychology. There are many theories as to the cause of these distresses. Followers of Albert Ellis' Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy have hypothesized that the maintaining of irrational beliefs causes emotional distress. Others have theorized that a condition known as alexithymia is responsible for emotional distresses. Literally \"no words for feelings,\" alexithymia is a condition where individuals are unable to describe their feelings, they are unable to distinguish between their feelings and bodily sensations, and they have a tendency to overemphasize the concrete details of external events. This project was conducted to compare the two theories and to determine whether they worked together to best predict the emotional distresses, or if one theory was superior to the other. Several self-report questionnaires were administered to college students. These questionnaires included the Survey of Personal Beliefs, the MalouffSchutte Belief Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS - 20), the Beck Depression Inventory, the neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that an TAS - 20 subscale, Difficulty Identifying Feelings, was an especially important predictor of all emotional dysfunction measures. The irrational belief constructs were not as important in explaining variance in anxiety, depression, and neuroticism. These data had a number of implications about attempts to relate irrational beliefs to emotional disturbance, about the scales used to measure irrational beliefs, and about the use of alexithymia to predict emotional disturbance."],"dc:identifier":["LB2369.2 .C843 2000","https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/900"],"dc:language":["English","eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"],"dc:relation":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Alexithymia","Emotions--Health aspects","Neuroticism","Anxiety disorders","Depression, Mental"],"dc:title":["Comparative analysis of irrational beliefs and alexithymia to predict anxiety, neuroticism, and depression"],"dc:type":["Masters theses","Text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:13Z"}