Back to results

University of North Texas

Assessing the Adlerian Personality Priorities: A Formal Instrument for Therapeutic Practice

Abstract

dc:description

The purpose of this study was to develop an effective formal instrument to assess the Adlerian personality priorities. The development of the Allen Assessment for Adlerian Personality Priorities, AAAPP, seeks to provide a strong comparability to assessing the Adlerian construct of personality priorities as the counselor interview. One hundred and seven participants were given the 1st administration of the AAAPP, Social Interest Scale and a demographic survey. Sixty-four participants completed a 2nd administration of the AAAPP two weeks later. Twenty participants experienced a counseling interview following the 2nd administration. The methods used to evaluate the validity and effectiveness of the AAAPP included: face validity, predictive validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, multiple regression, Guttman split-half reliability and the Spearman Brown reliability.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
University of North Texas
Year dc:date
2005

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Chandler, Cynthia K.
  • Kern, Carolyn
  • Norton, E. Douglas

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Public
  • Copyright
  • Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules
  • Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
oclc: 61850648
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4794/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc4794
OAI identifier oai:identifier
info:ark/67531/metadc4794

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of North Texas
Base URL
digital.library.unt.edu/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules. Assessing the Adlerian Personality Priorities: A Formal Instrument for Therapeutic Practice. University of North Texas, 2005. https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4794