{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4794"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4794","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Assessing the Adlerian Personality Priorities: A Formal Instrument for Therapeutic Practice","abstract":"The purpose of this study was to develop an effective formal instrument to assess the Adlerian personality priorities. The development of the Allen Assessment for Adlerian Personality Priorities, AAAPP, seeks to provide a strong comparability to assessing the Adlerian construct of personality priorities as the counselor interview. One hundred and seven participants were given the 1st administration of the AAAPP, Social Interest Scale and a demographic survey. Sixty-four participants completed a 2nd administration of the AAAPP two weeks later. Twenty participants experienced a counseling interview following the 2nd administration. The methods used to evaluate the validity and effectiveness of the AAAPP included: face validity, predictive validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, multiple regression, Guttman split-half reliability and the Spearman Brown reliability.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this study was to develop an effective formal instrument to assess the Adlerian personality priorities. The development of the Allen Assessment for Adlerian Personality Priorities, AAAPP, seeks to provide a strong comparability to assessing the Adlerian construct of personality priorities as the counselor interview. One hundred and seven participants were given the 1st administration of the AAAPP, Social Interest Scale and a demographic survey. Sixty-four participants completed a 2nd administration of the AAAPP two weeks later. Twenty participants experienced a counseling interview following the 2nd administration. The methods used to evaluate the validity and effectiveness of the AAAPP included: face validity, predictive validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, multiple regression, Guttman split-half reliability and the Spearman Brown reliability.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules"],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Chandler, Cynthia K.","Kern, Carolyn","Norton, E. Douglas"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-05","date_published":"2005-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Adlerian psychology.","Personality assessment.","counseling interview","Adlerian personal priority","face validity","AAAPP"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 61850648","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4794/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4794"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 61850648","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4794/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4794/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4794","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4794","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Chandler, Cynthia K.","Kern, Carolyn","Norton, E. Douglas"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2005-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Adlerian psychology.","Personality assessment.","counseling interview","Adlerian personal priority","face validity","AAAPP"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 61850648","doi: 10.12794/metadc4794","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4794/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4794"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The purpose of this study was to develop an effective formal instrument to assess the Adlerian personality priorities. The development of the Allen Assessment for Adlerian Personality Priorities, AAAPP, seeks to provide a strong comparability to assessing the Adlerian construct of personality priorities as the counselor interview. One hundred and seven participants were given the 1st administration of the AAAPP, Social Interest Scale and a demographic survey. Sixty-four participants completed a 2nd administration of the AAAPP two weeks later. Twenty participants experienced a counseling interview following the 2nd administration. The methods used to evaluate the validity and effectiveness of the AAAPP included: face validity, predictive validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, multiple regression, Guttman split-half reliability and the Spearman Brown reliability."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Assessing the Adlerian Personality Priorities: A Formal Instrument for Therapeutic Practice"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Chandler, Cynthia K.","Kern, Carolyn","Norton, E. Douglas"],"dc:creator":["Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules"],"dc:date":["2005-05"],"dc:description":["The purpose of this study was to develop an effective formal instrument to assess the Adlerian personality priorities. The development of the Allen Assessment for Adlerian Personality Priorities, AAAPP, seeks to provide a strong comparability to assessing the Adlerian construct of personality priorities as the counselor interview. One hundred and seven participants were given the 1st administration of the AAAPP, Social Interest Scale and a demographic survey. Sixty-four participants completed a 2nd administration of the AAAPP two weeks later. Twenty participants experienced a counseling interview following the 2nd administration. The methods used to evaluate the validity and effectiveness of the AAAPP included: face validity, predictive validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, multiple regression, Guttman split-half reliability and the Spearman Brown reliability."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 61850648","doi: 10.12794/metadc4794","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4794/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4794"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Allen, Elizabeth Gayle Soules","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Adlerian psychology.","Personality assessment.","counseling interview","Adlerian personal priority","face validity","AAAPP"],"dc:title":["Assessing the Adlerian Personality Priorities: A Formal Instrument for Therapeutic Practice"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}