Abstract
dc:description.abstractThis paper presents to the reader a panoramic view of the mechanics of jury selection utilized by a number of states in this union. It endeavors to demonstrate their differences as well as certain unique features that relate to those jurisdictions. And, even though the mandate of selecting a fair and impartial jury guides all of our states, the methodology in securing same can be interesting as to the differences in accomplishing that goal. Following a discussion of those various mechanics of jury selection will be a comparison of both the advantages and disadvantages of some of these mechanics. This writer will make a recommendation regarding the back-strike (a type of peremptory challenge). This type of peremptory challenge is allowed in some form in a minority of states. The above referenced topical discussions are offered for the reader's consideration as providing a better insight as to practices other than those that may be locally employed with a view toward improving same.
Degree
thesis:*- Level thesis:degree_level
- Master's Degree
- Year dc:date.issued
- 2014
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- LaDart, Ross P.
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Richardson, James T.
- Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
-
- Hannaford-Agor, Paula L
- Suntag, David T
Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- In Copyright(All Rights Reserved)
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2381
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:scholarwolf.unr.edu:11714/2381