{"id":{"repo_id":"unr","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarwolf.unr.edu:11714/2381"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unr/oai:scholarwolf.unr.edu:11714/2381","repository":{"repo_id":"unr","name":"University of Nevada - Reno","base_url":"https://scholarwolf.unr.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Mechanics of Jury Selection: Some Tools of the Trade","abstract":"This paper presents to the reader a panoramic view of the mechanics of jury selection utilized by a number of states in this union. It endeavors to demonstrate their differences as well as certain unique features that relate to those jurisdictions. And, even though the mandate of selecting a fair and impartial jury guides all of our states, the methodology in securing same can be interesting as to the differences in accomplishing that goal. Following a discussion of those various mechanics of jury selection will be a comparison of both the advantages and disadvantages of some of these mechanics. This writer will make a recommendation regarding the back-strike (a type of peremptory challenge). This type of peremptory challenge is allowed in some form in a minority of states. The above referenced topical discussions are offered for the reader's consideration as providing a better insight as to practices other than those that may be locally employed with a view toward improving same.","abstract_html":"This paper presents to the reader a panoramic view of the mechanics of jury selection utilized by a number of states in this union. It endeavors to demonstrate their differences as well as certain unique features that relate to those jurisdictions. And, even though the mandate of selecting a fair and impartial jury guides all of our states, the methodology in securing same can be interesting as to the differences in accomplishing that goal. Following a discussion of those various mechanics of jury selection will be a comparison of both the advantages and disadvantages of some of these mechanics. This writer will make a recommendation regarding the back-strike (a type of peremptory challenge). This type of peremptory challenge is allowed in some form in a minority of states. The above referenced topical discussions are offered for the reader's consideration as providing a better insight as to practices other than those that may be locally employed with a view toward improving same.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["LaDart, Ross P."],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":"Master's Degree","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Richardson, James T."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Hannaford-Agor, Paula L","Suntag, David T"],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014","date_published":"2014","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:47:25Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright(All Rights Reserved)"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2381","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Richardson, James T."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Hannaford-Agor, Paula L","Suntag, David T"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["LaDart, Ross P."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2017-12-11T17:57:54Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-12-11T17:57:54Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master's Degree"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright(All Rights Reserved)"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2381"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This paper presents to the reader a panoramic view of the mechanics of jury selection utilized by a number of states in this union. It endeavors to demonstrate their differences as well as certain unique features that relate to those jurisdictions. And, even though the mandate of selecting a fair and impartial jury guides all of our states, the methodology in securing same can be interesting as to the differences in accomplishing that goal. Following a discussion of those various mechanics of jury selection will be a comparison of both the advantages and disadvantages of some of these mechanics. This writer will make a recommendation regarding the back-strike (a type of peremptory challenge). This type of peremptory challenge is allowed in some form in a minority of states. The above referenced topical discussions are offered for the reader's consideration as providing a better insight as to practices other than those that may be locally employed with a view toward improving same."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["PDF"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Mechanics of Jury Selection: Some Tools of the Trade"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Richardson, James T."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Hannaford-Agor, Paula L","Suntag, David T"],"dc:creator":["LaDart, Ross P."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2017-12-11T17:57:54Z"],"dc:date.available":["2017-12-11T17:57:54Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014"],"dc:description.abstract":["This paper presents to the reader a panoramic view of the mechanics of jury selection utilized by a number of states in this union. It endeavors to demonstrate their differences as well as certain unique features that relate to those jurisdictions. And, even though the mandate of selecting a fair and impartial jury guides all of our states, the methodology in securing same can be interesting as to the differences in accomplishing that goal. Following a discussion of those various mechanics of jury selection will be a comparison of both the advantages and disadvantages of some of these mechanics. This writer will make a recommendation regarding the back-strike (a type of peremptory challenge). This type of peremptory challenge is allowed in some form in a minority of states. The above referenced topical discussions are offered for the reader's consideration as providing a better insight as to practices other than those that may be locally employed with a view toward improving same."],"dc:format":["PDF"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2381"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright(All Rights Reserved)"],"dc:title":["Mechanics of Jury Selection: Some Tools of the Trade"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master's Degree"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:47:25Z"}