Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Examining the fakability of forced-choice individual differences measures

Abstract

dc:description

Forced-choice (FC) is a popular format for developing noncognitive individual differences measures, where individuals are forced to choose one or multiple statements out of several options. FC measures have been proposed as a valuable approach to reduce score inflation in high-stakes assessments, but their effectiveness has not yet been examined in a meta-analysis. In my dissertation, I conducted two studies to examine the fakability of forced-choice personality and vocational interest measures. In the first study, I conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing FC personality measures between low-stakes and high-stakes situations. Results suggested that the overall score inflation effect size for FC personality measures is 0.05, which is much lower than the effect size for single-statement measures. The score inflation effect size was also found to vary across FC scale characteristics, study design factors, and personality facets. Specifically, a faking resistant FC scale should be constructed in a multidimensional PICK format, with statements balanced in social desirability and responses scored in a normative approach. Personality facets of high relevance to the target were found to exhibit larger inflation than facets of low relevance to the target job. In the second study, I conducted an induced faking study to examine the fakability of vocational interest measures and whether or not the FC format reduced the faking effect. With a sample of 1,559 respondents, I found that respondents consistently inflated the interest domain that matched the target job, and that the inflation led to a decreased level of criterion-related validity of interest-job fit. Multidimensional FC scales exhibited a smaller inflation effect on non-matched domains, but not on matched domains, than single-statement scales. However, the FC format did not reduce the level of criterion-related validity attenuation found in single-statement measures.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Psychology
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2016

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Cao, Mengyang
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Drasgow, Fritz
  • Carpenter, Nichelle C.
  • Chang, Hua-Hua
  • Newman, Daniel A.
  • Rounds, James

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright 2016 Mengyang Cao
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/93064
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/93064

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Cao, Mengyang. Examining the fakability of forced-choice individual differences measures. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/93064