Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The Liberalism-Communitarianism Debate: A Neo-Hegelian Aufhebung

Abstract

dc:description

The central issues in dispute between the liberals and communitarians arise from the social nature of individuals. Communitarians claim that this aspect of our nature requires a methodology that is rooted in the traditions and customs of particular societies. The substantive conclusions of this methodology should involve public policies for achieving a community in which individuals recognize that they belong to a common pursuit of a conception of the good. Liberals reject these proposals from concerns of both cultural relativism and state paternalism. I argue that a neo-Hegelian approach is sensitive to both sides of the dispute. My approach includes particular features of our Western democratic societies while also working with freedom as the fundamental political value; hence I combine communitarian particularity with the liberal emphasis on freedom. At the same time, I combine substantive policies for social unity with individual rights under a revised Hegelian account of the concept of freedom.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Philosophy
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2015

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Dickson, Eric Joshua
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Richard Schacht

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

Language dc:language
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
(MiAaPQ)AAI3314761
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87604

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Dickson, Eric Joshua. The Liberalism-Communitarianism Debate: A Neo-Hegelian Aufhebung. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87604