Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

A Comparison of Kernel Equating and Traditional Equipercentile Equating Methods and the Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Estimating Standard Errors in Equipercentile Equating

Abstract

dc:description

This study used simulation (a) to compare the kernel equating method to traditional equipercentile equating methods under the equivalent-groups (EG) design and the nonequivalent-groups with anchor test (NEAT) design and (b) to apply the parametric bootstrap method for estimating standard errors of equating. A two-parameter logistic item response theory (2-PL IRT) model was used to create population score distributions for different test sizes. Samples were drawn from the populations for different examinee sizes and the equating methods were evaluated using a criterion equating, which was an equipercentile equating function using the entire populations. Bias, standard errors, and root mean squared difference (RMSD) were used as measures to compare the methods to the criterion equating. The results show that KE and its traditional analogues are comparable under the EG design. However, under the NEAT design for which populations were created substantially different in this study, only the Post-stratification equating (PSE) with small or optimal bandwidth can produce results similar to those from the traditional frequency estimation method. Using the same data for equating under the EG design, the parametric bootstrap method was compared to the nonparametric bootstrap method and the analytic method. The results indicated that the parametric method resulted in more accurate estimates of standard errors of equating for all test and sample sizes considered than the other methods did.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Educational Psychology
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2015

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Choi, Sae Il
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Wardrop, James L.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

Language dc:language
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
(MiAaPQ)AAI3391908
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80112

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Choi, Sae Il. A Comparison of Kernel Equating and Traditional Equipercentile Equating Methods and the Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Estimating Standard Errors in Equipercentile Equating. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80112