Back to results
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Framing a Validity Argument for Test Use and Impact: The Malaysian Public Service Experience
Abstract
dc:descriptionOverall the interpretive argument framework for test validation as proposed by Kane worked well for the intended purpose of the study despite some drawbacks. These included the demands for comprehensiveness and the multitude of evidence needed in order to evaluate the strength of the validity argument for examining test use and impact and whether these demands can be met effectively by a single researcher in a single study.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Ph.D.
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Educational Psychology
- Grantor
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Year dc:date
- 2015
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Abdul Kadir, Kadeessa
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Davidson, Fred
Subjects
dc:subject × 1Rights
- Language dc:language
- eng
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Identifier
- (MiAaPQ)AAI3337680
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80046