Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

A Job Schema Approach to Understanding Job Responses (Priming)

Abstract

dc:description

This research used a field study and two laboratory studies to investigate questions stemming from Salancik and Pfeffer's (1977, 1978) criticisms of the Hackman and Oldham job characteristics model of satisfaction, motivation and productivity (1976, 1980). The first question asked whether the core job dimensions specified by Hackman and Oldham were salient to employees. Saliency was operationalized as what "stands out" to employees about their jobs, and was measured by having employees list, in open-ended format, the aspects that they think about when they think about their jobs. Results indicated that autonomy and variety, and the related aspects of responsibility and opportunities to learn, were salient to employees in this sample. In fact, these aspects were listed as often as pay and fringe benefits. However, feedback from the job itself, and task significance and identity, were not salient to these employees. The second question asked about priming effects: do written primes (i.e., questions) from questionnaires such as Hackman and Oldham's Job Diagnostic Survey (1975) make primed job aspects more salient? To answer this second question, Wyer and Srull's (1980) model of information processing and a notion of amount of exposure to the stimulus being processed were combined to form a job schema approach to understanding job responses. The Wyer and Srull model also suggested a third question, which dealt with delayed priming effects: do priming effects increase or decrease after a time delay? On the basis of the job schema approach, predictions were made concerning when priming effects and delayed priming effects would be found. Priming effects were operationalized as the difference between what is salient to primed and nonprimed participants, and delayed priming effects as the difference in job satisfaction variance accounted for by primes at two points in time. The predictions of the job schema approach were supported: priming effects and some indication of delayed priming effects were found for stimuli to which participants had little exposure, and were not found for stimuli to which participants had more extensive exposure.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Psychology
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date dc:date
10000-01-01

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Rotchford, Nancy Lynn

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
(UMI)AAI8409827
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/69629

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Rotchford, Nancy Lynn. A Job Schema Approach to Understanding Job Responses (Priming). Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, http://hdl.handle.net/2142/69629