Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Formalism and Contextualism in Moral Education: An Analysis of Two Exemplars

Abstract

dc:description

The dissertation aims to analyze the theories of Lawrence Kohlberg and Carol Gilligan as representatives of the formalist and the contextualist traditions in moral theory. It first examines problems that each theory leaves unresolved and explicates the apparent conflict and tension that exist between the two perspectives. The question of resolving the conflict between impartiality and particularity is a complex one to which no obvious and easy answer corresponds. While there are important conflicts and tensions between a formalist and a contextualist moral theory, these two points of view also serve to complement one another.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Education
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2014

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Cho, Kyung Won

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
(UMI)AAI8623271
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/69048

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Cho, Kyung Won. Formalism and Contextualism in Moral Education: An Analysis of Two Exemplars. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/69048