University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Formalism and Contextualism in Moral Education: An Analysis of Two Exemplars
Abstract
dc:descriptionThe dissertation aims to analyze the theories of Lawrence Kohlberg and Carol Gilligan as representatives of the formalist and the contextualist traditions in moral theory. It first examines problems that each theory leaves unresolved and explicates the apparent conflict and tension that exist between the two perspectives. The question of resolving the conflict between impartiality and particularity is a complex one to which no obvious and easy answer corresponds. While there are important conflicts and tensions between a formalist and a contextualist moral theory, these two points of view also serve to complement one another.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Ph.D.
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Education
- Grantor
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Year dc:date
- 2014
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Cho, Kyung Won
Subjects
dc:subject × 1Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Identifier
- (UMI)AAI8623271
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/69048