Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Reasoning with models of probabilistic knowledge over probabilistic knowledge

Abstract

dc:description

In multi-agent systems, the knowledge of agents about other agents’ knowledge often plays a pivotal role in their decisions. In many applications, this knowledge involves uncertainty. This uncertainty may be about the state of the world or about the other agents’ knowledge. In this thesis, we answer the question of how to model this probabilistic knowledge and reason about it efficiently. Modal logics enable representation of knowledge and belief by explicit reference to classical logical formulas in addition to references to those formulas’ truth values. Traditional modal logics (see e.g. [Fitting, 1993; Blackburn et al., 2007]) cannot easily represent scenarios involving degrees of belief. Works that combine modal logics and probabilities apply the representation power of modal operators for representing beliefs over beliefs, and the representation power of probability for modeling graded beliefs. Most tractable approaches apply a single model that is either engineered or learned, and reasoning is done within that model. Present model-based approaches of this kind are limited in that either their semantics is restricted to have all agents with a common prior on world states, or are resolving to reasoning algorithms that do not scale to large models. In this thesis we provide the first sampling-based algorithms for model-based reasoning in such combinations of modal logics and probability. We examine a different point than examined before in the expressivity-tractability tradeoff for that combination, and examine both general models and also models which use Bayesian Networks to represent subjective probabilistic beliefs of agents. We provide exact inference algorithms for the two representations, together with correctness results, and show that they are faster than comparable previous ones when some structural conditions hold. We also present sampling-based algorithms, show that those converge under relaxed conditions and that they may not converge otherwise, demonstrate the methods on some examples, and examine the performance of our algorithms experimentally.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Computer Science
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2011

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Shirazi, Afsaneh H.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Amir, Eyal
  • Roth, Dan
  • Forsyth, David A.
  • Chekuri, Chandra S.

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright 2011 Afsaneh H Shirazi
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24239
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24239

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Shirazi, Afsaneh H.. Reasoning with models of probabilistic knowledge over probabilistic knowledge. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24239