Abstract
dc:descriptionThis investigation seeks to prove that Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's works reveal a systematic view of polemic through an examination of Lessing's own statements on polemics, his use of polemical devices, and the complex way in which these factors interact with his theological positions. In order to discuss the philosophical and epistemological basis for Lessing's views, I analyze a number of texts which demonstrate and examine the methodological and philosophical dimensions of argument. This historical framework provides a theoretical model for an analysis of Lessing's position. Because Gorgias's Encomium of Helen and Plato's Gorgias present two opposition positions on rhetoric, these works provide a focus for my discussion of the conflict between rhetoric and philosophy evident in Lessing's formulation of his views on polemic.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Ph.D.
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Germanic Languages and Literatures
- Grantor
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Year dc:date
- 2011
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Moore, Evelyn Knopp
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- McGlathery, James M.
Subjects
dc:subject × 2Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- Copyright 1990 Moore, Evelyn Knopp
- Language dc:language
- eng
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Identifier
-
AAI9021730
(UMI)AAI9021730 - OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21500