Back to results

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Towards a general conceptual model for bibliographic aggregates: Four case studies from our bibliographic standards

Abstract

dc:description

Bibliographic aggregates such as anthologies, collections, journal issues, and media series are increasingly becoming the focus of bibliographic description. Bibliographic description, typically in the form of bibliographic metadata records, forms the cornerstone of information retrieval systems. Library users rely on bibliographic metadata records to find, identify, select, and obtain information resources of interest to them. In turn, library catalogers and metadata librarians rely on high-level conceptual standards to inform them regarding what metadata is central to each kind of bibliographic entity's description, including bibliographic aggregates like those mentioned above. However, not all of our high-level conceptual standards agree on how bibliographic aggregates should be modeled and what metadata is significant enough to be recorded in their bibliographic descriptions. This dissertation analyzes conceptual models for bibliographic aggregates central to metadata descriptions for bibliographic description in library settings. More specifically, this dissertation focuses on the variations in conceptual models for bibliographic aggregates in four high-level library-centric conceptual models: Dublin Core Collections Application Profile (DC-CAP), Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Object-Oriented FRBR, and Library Reference Model (LRM). The first three standards take an approach to modeling bibliographic aggregates that is based on concepts of parts and wholes. The more recent LRM standard takes a different approach by closely linking its bibliographic aggregate model to its central model for bibliographic entities in general—Work-Expression-Manifestation-Item (WEMI). This dissertation makes a conceptual analysis of all four approaches in order to compare, contrast, and reconcile their conceptual models for bibliographic aggregates.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Library & Information Science
Grantor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Year dc:date
2020

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Jett, Jacob
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Dubin, David
  • Renear, Allen H.
  • Wickett, Karen M.
  • Cole, Timothy W.
  • Downie, J. Stephen

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright 2019 Jacob Jett
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106154
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/106154

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Base URL
www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Jett, Jacob. Towards a general conceptual model for bibliographic aggregates: Four case studies from our bibliographic standards. Dissertation thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106154