Back to results

Rowan University

Computer assisted instruction or mnemonic strategy instruction: which approach produces better outcomes with helping students develop multiplication fact fluency?

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact mnemonic strategy instruction and computer assisted instruction had on helping students gain multiplication fact fluency. Thirteen, third grade students were provided with either mnemonic strategy instruction or computer assisted practice for six weeks to see which instructional approach assisted the children with fluency gains with multiplication facts. The two groups were assessed weekly with timed fact probes to evaluate progress. Baseline scores and ending scores were analyzed with a percent of change formula to reveal either an increase or decrease in fluency. The results of the comparison between the two approaches support the view that computer assisted instruction contributes more to fluency than does mnemonic strategy instruction.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
M.A. Learning Disabilities
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Special Educational Services/Instruction
Year dc:date.available
2010

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Flynn, Laura
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Kuder, S Jay

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/79
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:rdw.rowan.edu:etd-1078

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Rowan University
Base URL
rdw.rowan.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Flynn, Laura. Computer assisted instruction or mnemonic strategy instruction: which approach produces better outcomes with helping students develop multiplication fact fluency?. Thesis thesis, 2010. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/79