Back to search

Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Psychology, c2010

The motivational effect of need on decision-making under risk

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Risk-sensitivity theory predicts that decision-makers shift from risk-aversion to riskpreference in situations where low-risk options are unlikely to meet their needs. Risksensitive theory is contrasted with more traditional unbounded models of decision-making predicting that decision-makers seek to optimize utility in all decisions. In this dissertation, I review influential theories of decision-making from the various behavioral sciences, and offer an integrated approach to understanding decision-making informed by evolutionary theory. I then present evidence suggesting that risk-taking comprises a general phenomenon, inclusive of such behaviors as gambling and antisocial conduct. Finally, I demonstrate in several laboratory experiments that conditions of need, such as inequality, are important motivators of risky behavior. Together, the results suggest that risk-taking represents a functional triggering of preference for variable outcomes in response to conditions of need, consistent with risk-sensitivity theory.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Psychology, c2010
Year dc:date.issued
2010

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Authors dc:creator
  • Mishra, Sandeep
  • University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science
Advisor dc:contributor.supervisor
  • Lalumière, Martin L.

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
hdl:10133/2580

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Lethbridge
Base URL
opus.uleth.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-08-21
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Mishra, Sandeep; University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science. The motivational effect of need on decision-making under risk. Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Psychology, c2010, 2010. https://hdl.handle.net/10133/2580