Back to results

University of Cambridge

The doctrine of privity in negligence, 1842-1932

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis seeks to better understand the path of the doctrine of privity in the law of negligence and, in particular, why it was in 1932 that it was finally ousted by Donoghue v Stevenson. It is suggested that the doctrine of privity was introduced into the developing law of negligence by a court concerned with commercial consequences but developed into a rigid rule by the early twentieth century. By the 1920s, certain legal and extra-legal factors may be said to have created a state of affairs supportive of the removal of privity from the law of negligence and the recognition of manufacturer liability. It is argued that the continued challenges faced by married women in suing on a contract, as well as the rise of consumerism, the increased availability of liability insurance and a changing conception of the nature of negligence are all contemporaneous factors or developments that are likely to have increased the pressure for a change in the law. This thesis also uncovers material in newspaper reports showing that, despite the outcomes one might expect given the privity rule, plaintiffs were successfully suing for personal injuries arising from the use of defective products. An explanation is suggested: the emergence, at the turn of the century, of a line of argument based on the supply of dangerous items. Results similar to Donoghue were being reached, prior to 1932, without any formal change to the rules. This was yet another factor contributing to a climate in which Mrs Donoghue’s claim might form a tipping point for change.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2021

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Gordon, Emily
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Ibbetson, David

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
DOI dc:identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.71832
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/324377

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Gordon, Emily. The doctrine of privity in negligence, 1842-1932. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.71832