Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Estudo comparativo de julgamentos de relevância do usuário e não-usuário de serviços de disseminação seletiva da informação
Abstract
dc:description.abstractUser and non-user relevance judgments, of a group of documents in the field of nuclear energy, were compared Assessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onservedAssessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onserved It was concluded that user and non-user judgements were similar, with an acceptable number of disagreements. It was considered that the level of agreements eas not higher because users evaluate documents to their information needs, while non-users evaluate them to the proposed quesiton Is was statedthet the frequency of profile descriptors in document titles does not differentiate relevant documents from non-relevant ones.
Degree
thesis:*- Grantor dc:publisher
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
- Year dc:date.issued
- 1978
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Figueiredo, Regina Celia
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Saracevic, Tefko
Subjects
dc:subject × 4Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- Acesso Aberto
- Language dc:language
- por
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- http://hdl.handle.net/11422/8580
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:pantheon.ufrj.br:11422/8580