{"id":{"repo_id":"brazil-uerj","oai_identifier":"oai:pantheon.ufrj.br:11422/8580"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brazil-uerj/oai:pantheon.ufrj.br:11422/8580","repository":{"repo_id":"brazil-uerj","name":"Brazil UERJ","base_url":"https://pantheon.ufrj.br/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Estudo comparativo de julgamentos de relevância do usuário e não-usuário de serviços de disseminação seletiva da informação","abstract":"User and non-user relevance judgments, of a group of documents in the field of nuclear energy, were compared Assessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onservedAssessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onserved It was concluded that user and non-user judgements were similar, with an acceptable number of disagreements. It was considered that the level of agreements eas not higher because users evaluate documents to their information needs, while non-users evaluate them to the proposed quesiton Is was statedthet the frequency of profile descriptors in document titles does not differentiate relevant documents from non-relevant ones.","abstract_html":"User and non-user relevance judgments, of a group of documents in the field of nuclear energy, were compared Assessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onservedAssessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onserved It was concluded that user and non-user judgements were similar, with an acceptable number of disagreements. It was considered that the level of agreements eas not higher because users evaluate documents to their information needs, while non-users evaluate them to the proposed quesiton Is was statedthet the frequency of profile descriptors in document titles does not differentiate relevant documents from non-relevant ones.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Figueiredo, Regina Celia"],"institution":"Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Saracevic, Tefko"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1978,"date_issued":"1978","date_published":"1978","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:16:29Z","subjects":["Energia nuclear","Estudo de usuários","Disseminação seletiva da informação","Recuperação da informação"],"languages":["por"],"rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11422/8580","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Saracevic, Tefko"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Figueiredo, Regina Celia"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2019-06-29T00:49:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-05-16T03:05:49Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1978"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro","Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Escola de Comunicação"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertação"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Energia nuclear","Estudo de usuários","Disseminação seletiva da informação","Recuperação da informação"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["por"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Acesso Aberto"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11422/8580"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["User and non-user relevance judgments, of a group of documents in the field of nuclear energy, were compared Assessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onservedAssessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onserved It was concluded that user and non-user judgements were similar, with an acceptable number of disagreements. It was considered that the level of agreements eas not higher because users evaluate documents to their information needs, while non-users evaluate them to the proposed quesiton Is was statedthet the frequency of profile descriptors in document titles does not differentiate relevant documents from non-relevant ones."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Estudo comparativo de julgamentos de relevância do usuário e não-usuário de serviços de disseminação seletiva da informação"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Saracevic, Tefko"],"dc:creator":["Figueiredo, Regina Celia"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2019-06-29T00:49:08Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-05-16T03:05:49Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1978"],"dc:description.abstract":["User and non-user relevance judgments, of a group of documents in the field of nuclear energy, were compared Assessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onservedAssessments of relevance were done by document titles. The effectiveness of titles in determining relecance or non-relevance of documents was onserved It was concluded that user and non-user judgements were similar, with an acceptable number of disagreements. It was considered that the level of agreements eas not higher because users evaluate documents to their information needs, while non-users evaluate them to the proposed quesiton Is was statedthet the frequency of profile descriptors in document titles does not differentiate relevant documents from non-relevant ones."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11422/8580"],"dc:language":["por"],"dc:publisher":["Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro","Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia"],"dc:publisher.department":["Escola de Comunicação"],"dc:rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"dc:subject":["Energia nuclear","Estudo de usuários","Disseminação seletiva da informação","Recuperação da informação"],"dc:title":["Estudo comparativo de julgamentos de relevância do usuário e não-usuário de serviços de disseminação seletiva da informação"],"dc:type":["Dissertação"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:16:29Z"}