Back to results

University of Bradford

Dialogue and Resistance. An Evaluation of Two Approaches to Peace Campaigning at RAF Molesworth (1980-1987)

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Mohandas K. Gandhi believed that by engaging in various forms of nonviolent direct action a campaigning group could win over, or convert, even the hardest opponent to their cause. He also suggested that strict adherence to a discipline of nonviolence was necessary if such a group was to wield sufficient political power to coerce their opponent to accede to their demands. The efficacy of nonviolent direct action was put to the test over a seven-year period at RAF Molesworth in Cambridgeshire, in a series of campaigns which were attempting to stop deployment of Cruise Missiles there. Some campaigns concentrated on efforts to convert, others relied on the power of nonviolent direct action to coerce. None were particularly 'successful', though in the end the missiles were withdrawn. A careful examination of what went on at RAF Molesworth suggests that, in fact, the Gandhian conception is flawed. The requirements for conversion seem to preclude confrontation of the sort normally associated with nonviolent direct action, while effective coercion may demand a greater freedom from constraint than is normally acceptable in Gandhian terms. Dialogue, or the effort to convert, is an appropriate strategy for winning over the hearts and minds of neutral third parties (ie. the general public) to one's cause. Resistance, or the effort to coerce, then becomes an appropriate strategy only when the forces are stacked overwhelmingly against an opponent who still refuses to yield. Both approaches have a role to play in the ongoing struggle for social change. In the Gandhian conception, however, the two approaches are confused, diminishing the efficacy of both.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Bradford

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Wallis, Timmon Milne
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Not named

Subjects

dc:subject × 11

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>.
Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier.uri
https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/20598
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/20598

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Bradford
Base URL
bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Wallis, Timmon Milne. Dialogue and Resistance. An Evaluation of Two Approaches to Peace Campaigning at RAF Molesworth (1980-1987). University of Bradford, https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/20598