Abstract
dc:description.abstractSlobodan Milosevic's rhetoric is examined in light of Kenneth Burke's dramatism and scapegoating concepts. Burke's analysis of Adolf Hitler's use of scapegoating is explained and expanded to include Milosevic's use of scapegoating. The men's motives for scapegoating are compared and contrasted by looking at Hitler's Mein Kampf and "My Political Testament" and Milosevic's courtroom defense transcripts. Both men used scapegoating to unify groups of people and to create righteous identities to enable them to be on the "good" side of a conflict. These tactics advanced their agendas and allowed them to feel guiltless even while committing genocide.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- M.A.
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Masters
- Grantor
- Baylor University.
- Year dc:date.issued
- 2003
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Hagen, Christine R.
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Leeper, Karla K.
Subjects
dc:subject × 3Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.
- Language dc:language.iso
- en
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- https://hdl.handle.net/2104/14345
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/14345