University of Arkansas
Comparison of Various Pipelined and Non-Pipelined SCl 8051 ALUs
Abstract
dc:description.abstract<p>This paper describes the development of an 8-bit SCL 8051 ALU with two versions: SCL 8051 ALU with <em>nsleep</em> and <em>sleep</em> signals and SCL 8051 ALU without <em>nsleep</em>. Both versions have combinational logic (C/L), registers, and completion components, which all utilize slept gates. Both three-stage pipelined and non-pipelined designs were examined for both versions. The four designs were compared in terms of area, speed, leakage power, average power and energy per operation. The SCL 8051 ALU without <em>nsleep</em> is smaller and faster, but it has greater leakage power. It also has lower average power, and less energy consumption than the SCL 8051 ALU with both <em>nsleep</em> and <em>sleep</em> signals. The pipelined SCL 8051 ALU is bigger, slower, and has larger leakage power, average power and energy consumption than the non-pipelined SCL 8051 ALU.</p>
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Master of Science in Electrical Engineering (MSEE)
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Thesis
- Year dc:date.available
- 2012
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Zhao, Jingyi
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Smith, Scott C.
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Di, Jia
- Brown, Randy L.
Subjects
dc:subject × 5Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/552
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:scholarworks.uark.edu:etd-1551