{"id":{"repo_id":"york","oai_identifier":"oai:yorkspace.library.yorku.ca:10315/41966"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/york/oai:yorkspace.library.yorku.ca:10315/41966","repository":{"repo_id":"york","name":"York University","base_url":"https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Informality, Precarity, and (Mis)classification: Regulating Platform Work in India","abstract":"This thesis seeks to address the misclassification of location-based digital platform workers in India and examine the extent of protections that can be accorded to them within the framework of labour and constitutional rights. It firstly argues that the exclusion of platform workers from the purview of the formalistic labour law in India is not a novel phenomenon but, rather, is situated along a continuum of exclusionary regulatory practices dating back to the colonial era. Thereafter, the thesis examines the applicability of India’s extant, and fragmented, labour law framework to platform workers. It then embarks upon an analysis of the newly enacted labour Codes, which are yet to come into force and have sought to harmonize and consolidate the existing legal framework, to examine whether the said Codes constitute an improvement concerning platform workers’ rights. Lastly, it explores constitutional law as an alternative avenue for litigating platform workers’ rights.","abstract_html":"This thesis seeks to address the misclassification of location-based digital platform workers in India and examine the extent of protections that can be accorded to them within the framework of labour and constitutional rights. It firstly argues that the exclusion of platform workers from the purview of the formalistic labour law in India is not a novel phenomenon but, rather, is situated along a continuum of exclusionary regulatory practices dating back to the colonial era. Thereafter, the thesis examines the applicability of India’s extant, and fragmented, labour law framework to platform workers. It then embarks upon an analysis of the newly enacted labour Codes, which are yet to come into force and have sought to harmonize and consolidate the existing legal framework, to examine whether the said Codes constitute an improvement concerning platform workers’ rights. Lastly, it explores constitutional law as an alternative avenue for litigating platform workers’ rights.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Katrak, Malcolm Viraf"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["De Stefano, Valerio"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-03-16","date_published":"2024-03-16","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:33:40Z","subjects":["Law","Labor relations","Economics, Labor"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10315/41966","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["De Stefano, Valerio"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Katrak, Malcolm Viraf"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2024-03-18T18:16:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-03-18T18:16:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024-03-16"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Law","Labor relations","Economics, Labor"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10315/41966"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis seeks to address the misclassification of location-based digital platform workers in India and examine the extent of protections that can be accorded to them within the framework of labour and constitutional rights. It firstly argues that the exclusion of platform workers from the purview of the formalistic labour law in India is not a novel phenomenon but, rather, is situated along a continuum of exclusionary regulatory practices dating back to the colonial era. Thereafter, the thesis examines the applicability of India’s extant, and fragmented, labour law framework to platform workers. It then embarks upon an analysis of the newly enacted labour Codes, which are yet to come into force and have sought to harmonize and consolidate the existing legal framework, to examine whether the said Codes constitute an improvement concerning platform workers’ rights. Lastly, it explores constitutional law as an alternative avenue for litigating platform workers’ rights."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Informality, Precarity, and (Mis)classification: Regulating Platform Work in India"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["De Stefano, Valerio"],"dc:creator":["Katrak, Malcolm Viraf"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2024-03-18T18:16:42Z"],"dc:date.available":["2024-03-18T18:16:42Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2024-03-16"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis seeks to address the misclassification of location-based digital platform workers in India and examine the extent of protections that can be accorded to them within the framework of labour and constitutional rights. It firstly argues that the exclusion of platform workers from the purview of the formalistic labour law in India is not a novel phenomenon but, rather, is situated along a continuum of exclusionary regulatory practices dating back to the colonial era. Thereafter, the thesis examines the applicability of India’s extant, and fragmented, labour law framework to platform workers. It then embarks upon an analysis of the newly enacted labour Codes, which are yet to come into force and have sought to harmonize and consolidate the existing legal framework, to examine whether the said Codes constitute an improvement concerning platform workers’ rights. Lastly, it explores constitutional law as an alternative avenue for litigating platform workers’ rights."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10315/41966"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests."],"dc:subject":["Law","Labor relations","Economics, Labor"],"dc:title":["Informality, Precarity, and (Mis)classification: Regulating Platform Work in India"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:33:40Z"}