{"id":{"repo_id":"wvu","oai_identifier":"oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-2281"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wvu/oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-2281","repository":{"repo_id":"wvu","name":"West Virginia University","base_url":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Valuation of electric utility generating assets in a competitive environment","abstract":"Electricity industry restructuring, technological advances, and changing environmental laws and regulations are providing opportunities for many electricity companies to substantially lower their cost of doing business. One such cost is property tax, which in a majority of states is based upon the fair market value of property. Traditionally, assets of a regulated utility were valued at fair market value based upon the regulated price of electricity or \"rate base\". Valuation methods such as the income approach, replacement cost approach, comparable sales approach, and the stock and debt approach are common assessment methods for property tax (ad valorem) purposes. The appropriateness of each valuation method is examined for the purpose of valuing electricity generation assets in a competitive environment. Some states do not tax intangible property and most valuation methods include intangible property value. This aspect is addressed in the different valuation methods.","abstract_html":"Electricity industry restructuring, technological advances, and changing environmental laws and regulations are providing opportunities for many electricity companies to substantially lower their cost of doing business. One such cost is property tax, which in a majority of states is based upon the fair market value of property. Traditionally, assets of a regulated utility were valued at fair market value based upon the regulated price of electricity or "rate base". Valuation methods such as the income approach, replacement cost approach, comparable sales approach, and the stock and debt approach are common assessment methods for property tax (ad valorem) purposes. The appropriateness of each valuation method is examined for the purpose of valuing electricity generation assets in a competitive environment. Some states do not tax intangible property and most valuation methods include intangible property value. This aspect is addressed in the different valuation methods.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cain, Mary Barbara"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"MS","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Thomas F. Torries","Jerald J. Fletcher"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2001,"date_issued":"2001-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2001-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:15:31Z","subjects":["Economics","Commerce-Business","Energy"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1278"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1278","href":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1278","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.1278","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Thomas F. Torries","Jerald J. Fletcher"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cain, Mary Barbara"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-01-17T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["MS"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Economics","Commerce-Business","Energy"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.1278","https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1278"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Electricity industry restructuring, technological advances, and changing environmental laws and regulations are providing opportunities for many electricity companies to substantially lower their cost of doing business. One such cost is property tax, which in a majority of states is based upon the fair market value of property. Traditionally, assets of a regulated utility were valued at fair market value based upon the regulated price of electricity or \"rate base\". Valuation methods such as the income approach, replacement cost approach, comparable sales approach, and the stock and debt approach are common assessment methods for property tax (ad valorem) purposes. The appropriateness of each valuation method is examined for the purpose of valuing electricity generation assets in a competitive environment. Some states do not tax intangible property and most valuation methods include intangible property value. This aspect is addressed in the different valuation methods."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Valuation of electric utility generating assets in a competitive environment"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Thomas F. Torries","Jerald J. Fletcher"],"dc:creator":["Cain, Mary Barbara"],"dc:date.available":["2019-01-17T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Electricity industry restructuring, technological advances, and changing environmental laws and regulations are providing opportunities for many electricity companies to substantially lower their cost of doing business. One such cost is property tax, which in a majority of states is based upon the fair market value of property. Traditionally, assets of a regulated utility were valued at fair market value based upon the regulated price of electricity or \"rate base\". Valuation methods such as the income approach, replacement cost approach, comparable sales approach, and the stock and debt approach are common assessment methods for property tax (ad valorem) purposes. The appropriateness of each valuation method is examined for the purpose of valuing electricity generation assets in a competitive environment. Some states do not tax intangible property and most valuation methods include intangible property value. This aspect is addressed in the different valuation methods."],"dc:identifier":["https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.1278","https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1278"],"dc:subject":["Economics","Commerce-Business","Energy"],"dc:title":["Valuation of electric utility generating assets in a competitive environment"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["MS"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:15:31Z"}