{"id":{"repo_id":"wvu","oai_identifier":"oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-1770"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wvu/oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-1770","repository":{"repo_id":"wvu","name":"West Virginia University","base_url":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A study of the Japanese reflexive pronouns, zibun and zibun-zisin","abstract":"The behavior of various types of anaphors may be classified into two types, local and long-distance anaphors. The English reflexive 'himself' and the Japanese reflexive 'zibun' representatively characterize the two types of anaphors. They contrast in that 'himself' is a local anaphor, whereas 'zibun' is a long-distance anaphor. Japanese has another reflexive pronoun, `zibun-zisin', and it behaves more similarly to himself. The standard binding theory (Chomsky (1981)) regulates the behavior of local anaphors; however, the behavior of long-distance anaphors cannot be explained. One proposal for this matter is to invoke parameterization, which defines a language-specific binding domain for anaphors. Within this analysis, both local and long-distance anaphors are treated under Principle A of the standard binding theory. This thesis will examine the difference in the binding domain between 'zibun' and 'zibun-zisin'. To capture the difference accurately, some peculiar behaviors of 'zibun'/'zibun-zisin' such as backward reflexivization are also investigated with reference to recent linguistic studies.","abstract_html":"The behavior of various types of anaphors may be classified into two types, local and long-distance anaphors. The English reflexive 'himself' and the Japanese reflexive 'zibun' representatively characterize the two types of anaphors. They contrast in that 'himself' is a local anaphor, whereas 'zibun' is a long-distance anaphor. Japanese has another reflexive pronoun, `zibun-zisin', and it behaves more similarly to himself. The standard binding theory (Chomsky (1981)) regulates the behavior of local anaphors; however, the behavior of long-distance anaphors cannot be explained. One proposal for this matter is to invoke parameterization, which defines a language-specific binding domain for anaphors. Within this analysis, both local and long-distance anaphors are treated under Principle A of the standard binding theory. This thesis will examine the difference in the binding domain between 'zibun' and 'zibun-zisin'. To capture the difference accurately, some peculiar behaviors of 'zibun'/'zibun-zisin' such as backward reflexivization are also investigated with reference to recent linguistic studies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yamada, Masaru"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"MA","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"World Languages, Literatures and Linguistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Michael E. Reider.","Ahmed Fakhri","Johan Seynnaeve"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1999,"date_issued":"1999-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"1999-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:14:53Z","subjects":["Linguistics"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/767"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/767","href":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/767","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.767","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Michael E. Reider.","Ahmed Fakhri","Johan Seynnaeve"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yamada, Masaru"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-01-17T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["World Languages, Literatures and Linguistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["MA"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Linguistics"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.767","https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/767"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The behavior of various types of anaphors may be classified into two types, local and long-distance anaphors. The English reflexive 'himself' and the Japanese reflexive 'zibun' representatively characterize the two types of anaphors. They contrast in that 'himself' is a local anaphor, whereas 'zibun' is a long-distance anaphor. Japanese has another reflexive pronoun, `zibun-zisin', and it behaves more similarly to himself. The standard binding theory (Chomsky (1981)) regulates the behavior of local anaphors; however, the behavior of long-distance anaphors cannot be explained. One proposal for this matter is to invoke parameterization, which defines a language-specific binding domain for anaphors. Within this analysis, both local and long-distance anaphors are treated under Principle A of the standard binding theory. This thesis will examine the difference in the binding domain between 'zibun' and 'zibun-zisin'. To capture the difference accurately, some peculiar behaviors of 'zibun'/'zibun-zisin' such as backward reflexivization are also investigated with reference to recent linguistic studies."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A study of the Japanese reflexive pronouns, zibun and zibun-zisin"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Michael E. Reider.","Ahmed Fakhri","Johan Seynnaeve"],"dc:creator":["Yamada, Masaru"],"dc:date.available":["2019-01-17T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The behavior of various types of anaphors may be classified into two types, local and long-distance anaphors. The English reflexive 'himself' and the Japanese reflexive 'zibun' representatively characterize the two types of anaphors. They contrast in that 'himself' is a local anaphor, whereas 'zibun' is a long-distance anaphor. Japanese has another reflexive pronoun, `zibun-zisin', and it behaves more similarly to himself. The standard binding theory (Chomsky (1981)) regulates the behavior of local anaphors; however, the behavior of long-distance anaphors cannot be explained. One proposal for this matter is to invoke parameterization, which defines a language-specific binding domain for anaphors. Within this analysis, both local and long-distance anaphors are treated under Principle A of the standard binding theory. This thesis will examine the difference in the binding domain between 'zibun' and 'zibun-zisin'. To capture the difference accurately, some peculiar behaviors of 'zibun'/'zibun-zisin' such as backward reflexivization are also investigated with reference to recent linguistic studies."],"dc:identifier":["https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.767","https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/767"],"dc:subject":["Linguistics"],"dc:title":["A study of the Japanese reflexive pronouns, zibun and zibun-zisin"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["World Languages, Literatures and Linguistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["MA"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:14:53Z"}