Back to results

West Virginia University

Instructors' message variables and students' learning orientation/grade orientation and affective learning

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among instructors' message variables and students' learning orientation (LO), grade orientation (GO), and affective learning. Participants were 193 students (109 men, 83 women) enrolled in introductory communication courses at a large eastern university. Participants completed the Revised Self-Disclosure scale (Wheeless, 1978), the Humor Orientation scale (Booth-Butterfield & Booth-Butterfield, 1991), a narrative scale created for this study, the LOGO II scale (Milton, Pollio, & Eison, 1986) and the Instructional Affect Assessment Instrument (IAAI) (McCroskey, 1994). Results indicated instructors' message variables were not significantly related to students LO/GO, no significant differences among the four categories of LO/GO, and when controlling for LO/GO, few significant relationships were obtained between instructors' message variables and affective learning. Future research should examine if instructors' own learning orientation or grade orientation influences how LO/GO students perform in their course.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
MA
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Communication Studies
Year dc:date.available
2003

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Bell, Leeanne M.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Scott A. Myers.
  • Melanie Booth-Butterfield
  • James C. McCorskey

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-1745

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
West Virginia University
Base URL
researchrepository.wvu.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Bell, Leeanne M.. Instructors' message variables and students' learning orientation/grade orientation and affective learning. Thesis thesis, 2003. https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.742