{"id":{"repo_id":"wvu","oai_identifier":"oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-1369"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wvu/oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-1369","repository":{"repo_id":"wvu","name":"West Virginia University","base_url":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Police Officers Talking About Gun Control: A Case Study of a Rural Sheriff's Department","abstract":"This research examines how members of a rural police department view gun control, and the degree to which they think that gun control laws protect police officers and the public. Drawing on conclusions from interviews with twenty police officers within one local sheriff's department, three themes emerged: 1) the officers rejected gun control laws and deemed them ineffective for controlling criminal behavior; 2) the officers showed support for specific gun control measures such as, citizens obtaining concealed carry permits and expanding gun background checks; 3) the officers deemed guns to be an essential part of rural upbringing and identity. We concluded that based upon the officers conflicting views that there is conflict between the multiple identities the officers have. First, officers' identify as rural gun owners, who because of their upbringing see the symbolic value of gun ownership. Second, the officers identify as law enforcement officials and see the practicality of owning guns, but also see the flaws in current gun legislation. The study concludes by discussing the importance for politicians when creating future gun legislation to recognize the differences in rural and urban gun cultures.","abstract_html":"This research examines how members of a rural police department view gun control, and the degree to which they think that gun control laws protect police officers and the public. Drawing on conclusions from interviews with twenty police officers within one local sheriff's department, three themes emerged: 1) the officers rejected gun control laws and deemed them ineffective for controlling criminal behavior; 2) the officers showed support for specific gun control measures such as, citizens obtaining concealed carry permits and expanding gun background checks; 3) the officers deemed guns to be an essential part of rural upbringing and identity. We concluded that based upon the officers conflicting views that there is conflict between the multiple identities the officers have. First, officers' identify as rural gun owners, who because of their upbringing see the symbolic value of gun ownership. Second, the officers identify as law enforcement officials and see the practicality of owning guns, but also see the flaws in current gun legislation. The study concludes by discussing the importance for politicians when creating future gun legislation to recognize the differences in rural and urban gun cultures.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sycafoose, Angela"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"MA","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Sociology and Anthropology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rachael A. Woldoff","Corey Colyer","Jesse Wozniak"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2014-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:14:24Z","subjects":["Social structure","Criminology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/366"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/366","href":"https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/366","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.366","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rachael A. Woldoff","Corey Colyer","Jesse Wozniak"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sycafoose, Angela"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-01-17T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Sociology and Anthropology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["MA"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Social structure","Criminology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.366","https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/366"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This research examines how members of a rural police department view gun control, and the degree to which they think that gun control laws protect police officers and the public. Drawing on conclusions from interviews with twenty police officers within one local sheriff's department, three themes emerged: 1) the officers rejected gun control laws and deemed them ineffective for controlling criminal behavior; 2) the officers showed support for specific gun control measures such as, citizens obtaining concealed carry permits and expanding gun background checks; 3) the officers deemed guns to be an essential part of rural upbringing and identity. We concluded that based upon the officers conflicting views that there is conflict between the multiple identities the officers have. First, officers' identify as rural gun owners, who because of their upbringing see the symbolic value of gun ownership. Second, the officers identify as law enforcement officials and see the practicality of owning guns, but also see the flaws in current gun legislation. The study concludes by discussing the importance for politicians when creating future gun legislation to recognize the differences in rural and urban gun cultures."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Police Officers Talking About Gun Control: A Case Study of a Rural Sheriff's Department"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rachael A. Woldoff","Corey Colyer","Jesse Wozniak"],"dc:creator":["Sycafoose, Angela"],"dc:date.available":["2019-01-17T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This research examines how members of a rural police department view gun control, and the degree to which they think that gun control laws protect police officers and the public. Drawing on conclusions from interviews with twenty police officers within one local sheriff's department, three themes emerged: 1) the officers rejected gun control laws and deemed them ineffective for controlling criminal behavior; 2) the officers showed support for specific gun control measures such as, citizens obtaining concealed carry permits and expanding gun background checks; 3) the officers deemed guns to be an essential part of rural upbringing and identity. We concluded that based upon the officers conflicting views that there is conflict between the multiple identities the officers have. First, officers' identify as rural gun owners, who because of their upbringing see the symbolic value of gun ownership. Second, the officers identify as law enforcement officials and see the practicality of owning guns, but also see the flaws in current gun legislation. The study concludes by discussing the importance for politicians when creating future gun legislation to recognize the differences in rural and urban gun cultures."],"dc:identifier":["https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.366","https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/366"],"dc:subject":["Social structure","Criminology"],"dc:title":["Police Officers Talking About Gun Control: A Case Study of a Rural Sheriff's Department"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Sociology and Anthropology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["MA"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:14:24Z"}