Back to results

West Virginia University

Comparison of LTPP-Bind V3.1 and MEPDG for the Selection of Binder Grades

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Binders for five analysis locations and two pavement designs were selected using the LTPPBind V3.1 software. The recommended binders were then refined to meet realistic constraints of pavement construction in West Virginia. The performance of pavements with the selected binders, pavement structures and analysis locations was predicted using MEPDG. For the range of conditions evaluated in this study, the performance predictions of MEPDG were not sensitive to the binder selection. The materials models used in MEPDG for a Level 3 analysis were examined to assess why the predicted pavement performance was not sensitive to binder selection.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
MS
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Year dc:date.available
2012

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Bustos Rios, Jennifer
Contributors dc:contributor
  • John P. Zaniewski
  • John Quaranta
  • Avinash Unnikrishnan

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:researchrepository.wvu.edu:etd-1162

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
West Virginia University
Base URL
researchrepository.wvu.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Bustos Rios, Jennifer. Comparison of LTPP-Bind V3.1 and MEPDG for the Selection of Binder Grades. Thesis thesis, 2012. https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.159