This dissertation undertakes a comprehensive examination of the doctrine of the rule of law within the Indian constitutional framework, with particular emphasis on the judiciary’s role in interpreting constitutional limitations on legislative and executive power. Since the enforcement of the Constitution of India in 1950, the Indian Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in defining, operationalizing, and enforcing the rule of law through judicial review. However, this role has been accompanied by persistent doctrinal uncertainty, especially regarding the appropriate methodology of constitutional interpretation. This study critically explores how competing interpretative approaches—namely living constitutionalism, originalism, and the doctrine of basic structure—have shaped Indian constitutional jurisprudence and assesses their compatibility with the foundational ideals of the rule of law.
","abstract_html":"<p>This dissertation undertakes a comprehensive examination of the doctrine of the rule of law within the Indian constitutional framework, with particular emphasis on the judiciary’s role in interpreting constitutional limitations on legislative and executive power. Since the enforcement of the Constitution of India in 1950, the Indian Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in defining, operationalizing, and enforcing the rule of law through judicial review. However, this role has been accompanied by persistent doctrinal uncertainty, especially regarding the appropriate methodology of constitutional interpretation. This study critically explores how competing interpretative approaches—namely living constitutionalism, originalism, and the doctrine of basic structure—have shaped Indian constitutional jurisprudence and assesses their compatibility with the foundational ideals of the rule of law.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tyagi, Sankalp"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2025-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:08Z","subjects":["Rule of law, constitution, India","Constitutional Law","Law","Legal Studies"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/106","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tyagi, Sankalp"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-12-29T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Rule of law, constitution, India","Constitutional Law","Law","Legal Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/106"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation undertakes a comprehensive examination of the doctrine of the rule of law within the Indian constitutional framework, with particular emphasis on the judiciary’s role in interpreting constitutional limitations on legislative and executive power. Since the enforcement of the Constitution of India in 1950, the Indian Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in defining, operationalizing, and enforcing the rule of law through judicial review. However, this role has been accompanied by persistent doctrinal uncertainty, especially regarding the appropriate methodology of constitutional interpretation. This study critically explores how competing interpretative approaches—namely living constitutionalism, originalism, and the doctrine of basic structure—have shaped Indian constitutional jurisprudence and assesses their compatibility with the foundational ideals of the rule of law.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Constitutional limitations and the rule of law: an Indian perspective"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Tyagi, Sankalp"],"dc:date.available":["2025-12-29T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation undertakes a comprehensive examination of the doctrine of the rule of law within the Indian constitutional framework, with particular emphasis on the judiciary’s role in interpreting constitutional limitations on legislative and executive power. Since the enforcement of the Constitution of India in 1950, the Indian Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in defining, operationalizing, and enforcing the rule of law through judicial review. However, this role has been accompanied by persistent doctrinal uncertainty, especially regarding the appropriate methodology of constitutional interpretation. This study critically explores how competing interpretative approaches—namely living constitutionalism, originalism, and the doctrine of basic structure—have shaped Indian constitutional jurisprudence and assesses their compatibility with the foundational ideals of the rule of law.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/106"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Rule of law, constitution, India","Constitutional Law","Law","Legal Studies"],"dc:title":["Constitutional limitations and the rule of law: an Indian perspective"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:08Z"}