This dissertation argues for broader protection for architects, the copyright owner of architectural works, giving architects confidence in threatening litigation or settlement; however, this possible benefit may not be in keeping with the constitutional goal—promote the progress of useful arts in the United States; nonetheless, it contributes to flourishing the international architectural market. Take the Wangjing Soho dispute as an example; if there were complete protection, architects are not worried about the copycat internationally because complete copyright protection obligated by Berne Convention would provide them the confidence to create new buildings out of fear of copying by others. However, if without such protection, how is it in the United States? Pre-AWCPA still applies, e.g., plans are still not infringed by using them to construct the building architects depicted without their permission, and no protection for constructed buildings.
","abstract_html":"<p>This dissertation argues for broader protection for architects, the copyright owner of architectural works, giving architects confidence in threatening litigation or settlement; however, this possible benefit may not be in keeping with the constitutional goal—promote the progress of useful arts in the United States; nonetheless, it contributes to flourishing the international architectural market. Take the Wangjing Soho dispute as an example; if there were complete protection, architects are not worried about the copycat internationally because complete copyright protection obligated by Berne Convention would provide them the confidence to create new buildings out of fear of copying by others. However, if without such protection, how is it in the United States? Pre-AWCPA still applies, e.g., plans are still not infringed by using them to construct the building architects depicted without their permission, and no protection for constructed buildings.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cai, Kui Shirley"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kevin Collins, Supervising Professor"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-04-22T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2022-04-22T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:08Z","subjects":["Architecture, Architectural works, Copyright","Intellectual Property Law"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/78","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kevin Collins, Supervising Professor"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cai, Kui Shirley"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-06-16T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Architecture, Architectural works, Copyright","Intellectual Property Law"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/78"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation argues for broader protection for architects, the copyright owner of architectural works, giving architects confidence in threatening litigation or settlement; however, this possible benefit may not be in keeping with the constitutional goal—promote the progress of useful arts in the United States; nonetheless, it contributes to flourishing the international architectural market. Take the Wangjing Soho dispute as an example; if there were complete protection, architects are not worried about the copycat internationally because complete copyright protection obligated by Berne Convention would provide them the confidence to create new buildings out of fear of copying by others. However, if without such protection, how is it in the United States? Pre-AWCPA still applies, e.g., plans are still not infringed by using them to construct the building architects depicted without their permission, and no protection for constructed buildings.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Architecture and Copyright"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kevin Collins, Supervising Professor"],"dc:creator":["Cai, Kui Shirley"],"dc:date.available":["2022-06-16T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation argues for broader protection for architects, the copyright owner of architectural works, giving architects confidence in threatening litigation or settlement; however, this possible benefit may not be in keeping with the constitutional goal—promote the progress of useful arts in the United States; nonetheless, it contributes to flourishing the international architectural market. Take the Wangjing Soho dispute as an example; if there were complete protection, architects are not worried about the copycat internationally because complete copyright protection obligated by Berne Convention would provide them the confidence to create new buildings out of fear of copying by others. However, if without such protection, how is it in the United States? Pre-AWCPA still applies, e.g., plans are still not infringed by using them to construct the building architects depicted without their permission, and no protection for constructed buildings.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/78"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Architecture, Architectural works, Copyright","Intellectual Property Law"],"dc:title":["Architecture and Copyright"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:08Z"}