{"id":{"repo_id":"wustl","oai_identifier":"oai:openscholarship.wustl.edu:law_etds-1024"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wustl/oai:openscholarship.wustl.edu:law_etds-1024","repository":{"repo_id":"wustl","name":"Washington University in St. Louis","base_url":"https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Class Action Mechanisms Across the Pacific: The Missions of Class Action Mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan","abstract":"This study provides an overview of class action mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan, including an analysis of the legal and court systems or other institutions involved in the implementation of class action devices. Class actions have been a prominent feature of U.S. civil procedure law. However, with the increase in collective or mass conflicts inherent in modern industrialized society, Mainland China and Taiwan have begun to deal with the pressing need for solving class disputes. Scholars have been disputing whether class action mechanisms are compatible with civil law systems. This question becomes more critical when taking into consideration the cultural, political and economic backgrounds of Mainland China and Taiwan, in the context of distinct non-democratic and democratic governmental systems...","abstract_html":"This study provides an overview of class action mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan, including an analysis of the legal and court systems or other institutions involved in the implementation of class action devices. Class actions have been a prominent feature of U.S. civil procedure law. However, with the increase in collective or mass conflicts inherent in modern industrialized society, Mainland China and Taiwan have begun to deal with the pressing need for solving class disputes. Scholars have been disputing whether class action mechanisms are compatible with civil law systems. This question becomes more critical when taking into consideration the cultural, political and economic backgrounds of Mainland China and Taiwan, in the context of distinct non-democratic and democratic governmental systems...","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Shao, Jing Huey"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["John Owen Haley, Supervising Professor Frances H. Foster, Examining Professor Gerrit De Geest, Examining Professor"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-06-22T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2011-06-22T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:08Z","subjects":["Class actions","Mass Torts","Civil Procedure","China","Taiwan","Comparative law","Comparative and Foreign Law","Torts"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.7936/0sd2-r923"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.7936/0sd2-r923","href":"https://doi.org/10.7936/0sd2-r923","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/25","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["John Owen Haley, Supervising Professor Frances H. Foster, Examining Professor Gerrit De Geest, Examining Professor"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Shao, Jing Huey"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-08-22T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Class actions","Mass Torts","Civil Procedure","China","Taiwan","Comparative law","Comparative and Foreign Law","Torts"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/25"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.7936/0sd2-r923"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study provides an overview of class action mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan, including an analysis of the legal and court systems or other institutions involved in the implementation of class action devices. Class actions have been a prominent feature of U.S. civil procedure law. However, with the increase in collective or mass conflicts inherent in modern industrialized society, Mainland China and Taiwan have begun to deal with the pressing need for solving class disputes. Scholars have been disputing whether class action mechanisms are compatible with civil law systems. This question becomes more critical when taking into consideration the cultural, political and economic backgrounds of Mainland China and Taiwan, in the context of distinct non-democratic and democratic governmental systems..."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Class Action Mechanisms Across the Pacific: The Missions of Class Action Mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["John Owen Haley, Supervising Professor Frances H. Foster, Examining Professor Gerrit De Geest, Examining Professor"],"dc:creator":["Shao, Jing Huey"],"dc:date.available":["2017-08-22T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study provides an overview of class action mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan, including an analysis of the legal and court systems or other institutions involved in the implementation of class action devices. Class actions have been a prominent feature of U.S. civil procedure law. However, with the increase in collective or mass conflicts inherent in modern industrialized society, Mainland China and Taiwan have begun to deal with the pressing need for solving class disputes. Scholars have been disputing whether class action mechanisms are compatible with civil law systems. This question becomes more critical when taking into consideration the cultural, political and economic backgrounds of Mainland China and Taiwan, in the context of distinct non-democratic and democratic governmental systems..."],"dc:identifier":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_etds/25"],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.7936/0sd2-r923"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Class actions","Mass Torts","Civil Procedure","China","Taiwan","Comparative law","Comparative and Foreign Law","Torts"],"dc:title":["The Class Action Mechanisms Across the Pacific: The Missions of Class Action Mechanisms in the U.S., China and Taiwan"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:08Z"}