{"id":{"repo_id":"wustl","oai_identifier":"oai:openscholarship.wustl.edu:etd-1025"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wustl/oai:openscholarship.wustl.edu:etd-1025","repository":{"repo_id":"wustl","name":"Washington University in St. Louis","base_url":"https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Personal Cognition and the Affect Regulation Process: Affect Reactivity, Affect Regulation Ability, and Responses to Cognitive Errors.","abstract":"A growing body of research examines relationships between cognitive tendencies and a number of personality and affective: i.e. emotional) traits. While several mechanisms have been suggested to explain these links, the exact reasons for the observed effects remain unclear in a number of circumstances. The current research examines the potential underlying mechanisms of observed links between cognitive error reactivity and various components of the affect regulation process; those individuals who make errors in strings on standard cognitive tasks are higher in trait negative affect, react more strongly to negative daily events, and may show deficits in self-regulation ability: Compton, Robinson, Ode, Quandt, Fineman, & Carp, 2008). The current study tests whether observed links between cognitive error reactivity and affective traits/processes are due to affect reactivity: Larsen, & Ketelaar, 1989) or affect regulation ability: Hemenover, Augustine, Shulman, Tran, & Barlett, 2008). Participants completed measures of both personality and error reactivity and then underwent an anxiety induction followed by one of three affect regulation tasks. Results reveal that neither affect reactivity: i.e., reaction to the anxiety induction) nor affect regulation ability: i.e., affective change due to the regulation task) adequately explain links between error reactivity and personality. The implications of these findings for both personality and cognitive psychology are discussed.","abstract_html":"A growing body of research examines relationships between cognitive tendencies and a number of personality and affective: i.e. emotional) traits. While several mechanisms have been suggested to explain these links, the exact reasons for the observed effects remain unclear in a number of circumstances. The current research examines the potential underlying mechanisms of observed links between cognitive error reactivity and various components of the affect regulation process; those individuals who make errors in strings on standard cognitive tasks are higher in trait negative affect, react more strongly to negative daily events, and may show deficits in self-regulation ability: Compton, Robinson, Ode, Quandt, Fineman, & Carp, 2008). The current study tests whether observed links between cognitive error reactivity and affective traits/processes are due to affect reactivity: Larsen, & Ketelaar, 1989) or affect regulation ability: Hemenover, Augustine, Shulman, Tran, & Barlett, 2008). Participants completed measures of both personality and error reactivity and then underwent an anxiety induction followed by one of three affect regulation tasks. Results reveal that neither affect reactivity: i.e., reaction to the anxiety induction) nor affect regulation ability: i.e., affective change due to the regulation task) adequately explain links between error reactivity and personality. The implications of these findings for both personality and cognitive psychology are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Augustine, Adam"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Randy Larsen"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2011-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:48Z","subjects":["Psychology","affect reactivity","affect regulation","emotion","error regulation","neuroticism"],"languages":["English (en)"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.7936/K7BP00XB"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.7936/K7BP00XB","href":"https://doi.org/10.7936/K7BP00XB","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/26","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Randy Larsen"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Augustine, Adam"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology","affect reactivity","affect regulation","emotion","error regulation","neuroticism"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English (en)"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/26"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.7936/K7BP00XB"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A growing body of research examines relationships between cognitive tendencies and a number of personality and affective: i.e. emotional) traits. While several mechanisms have been suggested to explain these links, the exact reasons for the observed effects remain unclear in a number of circumstances. The current research examines the potential underlying mechanisms of observed links between cognitive error reactivity and various components of the affect regulation process; those individuals who make errors in strings on standard cognitive tasks are higher in trait negative affect, react more strongly to negative daily events, and may show deficits in self-regulation ability: Compton, Robinson, Ode, Quandt, Fineman, & Carp, 2008). The current study tests whether observed links between cognitive error reactivity and affective traits/processes are due to affect reactivity: Larsen, & Ketelaar, 1989) or affect regulation ability: Hemenover, Augustine, Shulman, Tran, & Barlett, 2008). Participants completed measures of both personality and error reactivity and then underwent an anxiety induction followed by one of three affect regulation tasks. Results reveal that neither affect reactivity: i.e., reaction to the anxiety induction) nor affect regulation ability: i.e., affective change due to the regulation task) adequately explain links between error reactivity and personality. The implications of these findings for both personality and cognitive psychology are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Personal Cognition and the Affect Regulation Process: Affect Reactivity, Affect Regulation Ability, and Responses to Cognitive Errors."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Randy Larsen"],"dc:creator":["Augustine, Adam"],"dc:date.available":["2011-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["A growing body of research examines relationships between cognitive tendencies and a number of personality and affective: i.e. emotional) traits. While several mechanisms have been suggested to explain these links, the exact reasons for the observed effects remain unclear in a number of circumstances. The current research examines the potential underlying mechanisms of observed links between cognitive error reactivity and various components of the affect regulation process; those individuals who make errors in strings on standard cognitive tasks are higher in trait negative affect, react more strongly to negative daily events, and may show deficits in self-regulation ability: Compton, Robinson, Ode, Quandt, Fineman, & Carp, 2008). The current study tests whether observed links between cognitive error reactivity and affective traits/processes are due to affect reactivity: Larsen, & Ketelaar, 1989) or affect regulation ability: Hemenover, Augustine, Shulman, Tran, & Barlett, 2008). Participants completed measures of both personality and error reactivity and then underwent an anxiety induction followed by one of three affect regulation tasks. Results reveal that neither affect reactivity: i.e., reaction to the anxiety induction) nor affect regulation ability: i.e., affective change due to the regulation task) adequately explain links between error reactivity and personality. The implications of these findings for both personality and cognitive psychology are discussed."],"dc:identifier":["https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/26"],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.7936/K7BP00XB"],"dc:language":["English (en)"],"dc:subject":["Psychology","affect reactivity","affect regulation","emotion","error regulation","neuroticism"],"dc:title":["Personal Cognition and the Affect Regulation Process: Affect Reactivity, Affect Regulation Ability, and Responses to Cognitive Errors."],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:12:48Z"}