{"id":{"repo_id":"wurz-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de:1254"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wurz-thes/oai:opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de:1254","repository":{"repo_id":"wurz-thes","name":"Universität Wüzburg","base_url":"https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/oai"},"display":{"title":"The NoGo-anteriorization and its relation to a central inhibitory mechanism","abstract":"The maximum of the brain electrical field after NoGo stimuli is located more anteriorly than that after stimuli that tells participants to respond. The difference in topography was called NoGo-Anteriorization (NGA). Recently, there was a debate, whether the NGA is related to a central inhibitory process or not. However, experiments showed that the NGA is not the result of motor potentials during Go trials, the NGA does not represent higher response conflict and or higher mental effort in NoGo trials, and the NGA is not based on less cognitive response selection in NoGo trials. Therefore, the experiments support the assumption that the NGA is connected to an inhibitory mechanism in NoGo conditions.","abstract_html":"The maximum of the brain electrical field after NoGo stimuli is located more anteriorly than that after stimuli that tells participants to respond. The difference in topography was called NoGo-Anteriorization (NGA). Recently, there was a debate, whether the NGA is related to a central inhibitory process or not. However, experiments showed that the NGA is not the result of motor potentials during Go trials, the NGA does not represent higher response conflict and or higher mental effort in NoGo trials, and the NGA is not based on less cognitive response selection in NoGo trials. Therefore, the experiments support the assumption that the NGA is connected to an inhibitory mechanism in NoGo conditions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wagener, Annika"],"institution":"Universität Würzburg","degree_name":null,"degree_level":"thesis.doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hoffmann, Joachim"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-07-06","date_published":"2005-07-06","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:11:41Z","subjects":["NoGo-P300","Hemmung","EEG","inhibition"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1254","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"source_url"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hoffmann, Joachim"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wagener, Annika"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Universität Würzburg"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["doctoralThesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["thesis.doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Universität Würzburg"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["NoGo-P300","Hemmung","EEG","inhibition"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The maximum of the brain electrical field after NoGo stimuli is located more anteriorly than that after stimuli that tells participants to respond. The difference in topography was called NoGo-Anteriorization (NGA). Recently, there was a debate, whether the NGA is related to a central inhibitory process or not. However, experiments showed that the NGA is not the result of motor potentials during Go trials, the NGA does not represent higher response conflict and or higher mental effort in NoGo trials, and the NGA is not based on less cognitive response selection in NoGo trials. Therefore, the experiments support the assumption that the NGA is connected to an inhibitory mechanism in NoGo conditions.","In Go-NoGo-Aufgaben unterscheidet sich das ereignis-korrelierte Potential der P300 nach einem Go-Stimulus topographisch von dem der P300 nach einem NoGo-Stimulus. Dieser Unterschied wurde auch als NoGo-Anteriorisierung bezeichnet, da die Topographie der NoGo-P300 weiter anterior liegt. Es wurde diskutiert, ob diese NGA als Korrelat eines Hemmprozesses interpretiert werden darf. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die NGA weder auf motorische Potentiale während Go-Trials, noch auf Handlungskonflikt, oder auf fehlende Antwortprozesse während NoGo-Trials zurückzuführen war. Deshalb wird die Erklärung als Korrelat eines Hemmprozesses favorisiert."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The NoGo-anteriorization and its relation to a central inhibitory mechanism","Die NoGo-Anteriorisierung und ihr Bezug zu einem zentralen Hemmmechanismus"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hoffmann, Joachim"],"dc:creator":["Wagener, Annika"],"dc:description.abstract":["The maximum of the brain electrical field after NoGo stimuli is located more anteriorly than that after stimuli that tells participants to respond. The difference in topography was called NoGo-Anteriorization (NGA). Recently, there was a debate, whether the NGA is related to a central inhibitory process or not. However, experiments showed that the NGA is not the result of motor potentials during Go trials, the NGA does not represent higher response conflict and or higher mental effort in NoGo trials, and the NGA is not based on less cognitive response selection in NoGo trials. Therefore, the experiments support the assumption that the NGA is connected to an inhibitory mechanism in NoGo conditions.","In Go-NoGo-Aufgaben unterscheidet sich das ereignis-korrelierte Potential der P300 nach einem Go-Stimulus topographisch von dem der P300 nach einem NoGo-Stimulus. Dieser Unterschied wurde auch als NoGo-Anteriorisierung bezeichnet, da die Topographie der NoGo-P300 weiter anterior liegt. Es wurde diskutiert, ob diese NGA als Korrelat eines Hemmprozesses interpretiert werden darf. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die NGA weder auf motorische Potentiale während Go-Trials, noch auf Handlungskonflikt, oder auf fehlende Antwortprozesse während NoGo-Trials zurückzuführen war. Deshalb wird die Erklärung als Korrelat eines Hemmprozesses favorisiert."],"dc:format.medium":["application/pdf"],"dc:publisher":["Universität Würzburg"],"dc:subject":["NoGo-P300","Hemmung","EEG","inhibition"],"dc:title":["The NoGo-anteriorization and its relation to a central inhibitory mechanism","Die NoGo-Anteriorisierung und ihr Bezug zu einem zentralen Hemmmechanismus"],"dc:type":["doctoralThesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["thesis.doctoral"],"thesis:institution_name":["Universität Würzburg"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:11:41Z"}