{"id":{"repo_id":"wku-diss","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.wku.edu:theses-2142"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wku-diss/oai:digitalcommons.wku.edu:theses-2142","repository":{"repo_id":"wku-diss","name":"Western Kentucky University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Comparison of Creel Survey Data to Traditional Sampling Techniques in Pit-Lake Fisheries of Muhlenberg County, Kentucky","abstract":"<p>Populations of largemouth bass, <em>Micropterus salmoides</em>, and bluegill, <em>Lepomis macrochirus</em>, were evaluated from five pit-lakes in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, to determine if accurate proportional stock density (PSD) data can be obtained from a mandatory creel survey. It was hypothesized that the proportion of stock-to-quality (300-400mm) and quality (+400mm) largemouth bass from four years (2007-2010) of creel survey data would be statistically similar to those generated through on-site sampling in 2011. Fish were collected via a combination of gill netting, seining, hook-and-line fishing, and boat-mounted electro-fishing. In two of the pit-lakes, the sampling-generated length frequency data was not significantly different from the creel survey data (Pump G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=0.03, P=0.8629, Goose G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=0.76, P=0.3850). There were significant differences between creel and sampling data for the other pit-lakes (Big Reno<sub> </sub>G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=5.74 P=0.0166, Airstrip G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=14.3 P=0.0002, Lime G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=9.81 P=0.0017). At least one of the lakes likely demonstrated significances because of low sample size (Airstrip and/or Lime). Changes in population structure due to modified harvest regulations may be responsible for the significant differences (Big Reno and Lime). Population structures were verified with relative weight, length-at-age, and an assessment of five years of largemouth bass and bluegill PSD data. It appears that creel survey data does accurately reflect that of simple sampling techniques and can help guide management decisions.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Populations of largemouth bass, &lt;em&gt;Micropterus salmoides&lt;/em&gt;, and bluegill, &lt;em&gt;Lepomis macrochirus&lt;/em&gt;, were evaluated from five pit-lakes in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, to determine if accurate proportional stock density (PSD) data can be obtained from a mandatory creel survey. It was hypothesized that the proportion of stock-to-quality (300-400mm) and quality (+400mm) largemouth bass from four years (2007-2010) of creel survey data would be statistically similar to those generated through on-site sampling in 2011. Fish were collected via a combination of gill netting, seining, hook-and-line fishing, and boat-mounted electro-fishing. In two of the pit-lakes, the sampling-generated length frequency data was not significantly different from the creel survey data (Pump G&lt;sub&gt;adj[1]&lt;/sub&gt;=0.03, P=0.8629, Goose G&lt;sub&gt;adj[1]&lt;/sub&gt;=0.76, P=0.3850). There were significant differences between creel and sampling data for the other pit-lakes (Big Reno&lt;sub&gt; &lt;/sub&gt;G&lt;sub&gt;adj[1]&lt;/sub&gt;=5.74 P=0.0166, Airstrip G&lt;sub&gt;adj[1]&lt;/sub&gt;=14.3 P=0.0002, Lime G&lt;sub&gt;adj[1]&lt;/sub&gt;=9.81 P=0.0017). At least one of the lakes likely demonstrated significances because of low sample size (Airstrip and/or Lime). Changes in population structure due to modified harvest regulations may be responsible for the significant differences (Big Reno and Lime). Population structures were verified with relative weight, length-at-age, and an assessment of five years of largemouth bass and bluegill PSD data. It appears that creel survey data does accurately reflect that of simple sampling techniques and can help guide management decisions.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rupert, Derek L."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"Department of Biology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Phil Lienesch (Director), Dr. Steve Huskey, Dr. Scott Grubbs"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2012-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:08:09Z","subjects":["creel survey","pit-lake","PSD","largemouth bass","Wendell Ford Regional Training Center","bluegill","Aquaculture and Fisheries","Biology","Marine Biology","Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1138","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Phil Lienesch (Director), Dr. Steve Huskey, Dr. Scott Grubbs"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rupert, Derek L."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Department of Biology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["creel survey","pit-lake","PSD","largemouth bass","Wendell Ford Regional Training Center","bluegill","Aquaculture and Fisheries","Biology","Marine Biology","Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1138"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Populations of largemouth bass, <em>Micropterus salmoides</em>, and bluegill, <em>Lepomis macrochirus</em>, were evaluated from five pit-lakes in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, to determine if accurate proportional stock density (PSD) data can be obtained from a mandatory creel survey. It was hypothesized that the proportion of stock-to-quality (300-400mm) and quality (+400mm) largemouth bass from four years (2007-2010) of creel survey data would be statistically similar to those generated through on-site sampling in 2011. Fish were collected via a combination of gill netting, seining, hook-and-line fishing, and boat-mounted electro-fishing. In two of the pit-lakes, the sampling-generated length frequency data was not significantly different from the creel survey data (Pump G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=0.03, P=0.8629, Goose G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=0.76, P=0.3850). There were significant differences between creel and sampling data for the other pit-lakes (Big Reno<sub> </sub>G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=5.74 P=0.0166, Airstrip G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=14.3 P=0.0002, Lime G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=9.81 P=0.0017). At least one of the lakes likely demonstrated significances because of low sample size (Airstrip and/or Lime). Changes in population structure due to modified harvest regulations may be responsible for the significant differences (Big Reno and Lime). Population structures were verified with relative weight, length-at-age, and an assessment of five years of largemouth bass and bluegill PSD data. It appears that creel survey data does accurately reflect that of simple sampling techniques and can help guide management decisions.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparison of Creel Survey Data to Traditional Sampling Techniques in Pit-Lake Fisheries of Muhlenberg County, Kentucky"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Phil Lienesch (Director), Dr. Steve Huskey, Dr. Scott Grubbs"],"dc:creator":["Rupert, Derek L."],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Populations of largemouth bass, <em>Micropterus salmoides</em>, and bluegill, <em>Lepomis macrochirus</em>, were evaluated from five pit-lakes in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, to determine if accurate proportional stock density (PSD) data can be obtained from a mandatory creel survey. It was hypothesized that the proportion of stock-to-quality (300-400mm) and quality (+400mm) largemouth bass from four years (2007-2010) of creel survey data would be statistically similar to those generated through on-site sampling in 2011. Fish were collected via a combination of gill netting, seining, hook-and-line fishing, and boat-mounted electro-fishing. In two of the pit-lakes, the sampling-generated length frequency data was not significantly different from the creel survey data (Pump G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=0.03, P=0.8629, Goose G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=0.76, P=0.3850). There were significant differences between creel and sampling data for the other pit-lakes (Big Reno<sub> </sub>G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=5.74 P=0.0166, Airstrip G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=14.3 P=0.0002, Lime G<sub>adj[1]</sub>=9.81 P=0.0017). At least one of the lakes likely demonstrated significances because of low sample size (Airstrip and/or Lime). Changes in population structure due to modified harvest regulations may be responsible for the significant differences (Big Reno and Lime). Population structures were verified with relative weight, length-at-age, and an assessment of five years of largemouth bass and bluegill PSD data. It appears that creel survey data does accurately reflect that of simple sampling techniques and can help guide management decisions.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1138"],"dc:subject":["creel survey","pit-lake","PSD","largemouth bass","Wendell Ford Regional Training Center","bluegill","Aquaculture and Fisheries","Biology","Marine Biology","Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology"],"dc:title":["Comparison of Creel Survey Data to Traditional Sampling Techniques in Pit-Lake Fisheries of Muhlenberg County, Kentucky"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Department of Biology"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:08:09Z"}