Back to results

Western Kentucky University

Evaluation of Annotation Performances between Automated and Curated Databases of <i>E.COLI</i> Using the Correlation Coefficient

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This project compared the performance of the correlation coefficient to show similarities in annotations between a predictive automated bacterial annotation database and the curated EcoCyc database. EcoCyc is a conservative multidimensional annotation system that is exclusively based on experimentally validated findings by over 15,000 publications. The automated annotation system, used in the comparison was BASys. It is often used as a first pass annotation tool that tries to add as many annotations as possible by drawing upon over 30 information sources. Gene ontology served as one basis of comparison between these databases because of the limited common terms in the ontology annotations. Translation libraries were used to extend the number of BASys terms that could be compared to the gene ontology terms in EcoCyc. Additional, non-ontology terms and metadata in BASys were compared to EcoCyc terms after parsing them into root words. The different term sources were quantitatively compared by using the correlation coefficient as the evaluation metric. The direct gene ontology comparison gave the lowest correlation coefficient. The addition of gene ontology terms to BASys by using translation tables of metadata greatly increased the correlation coefficient, which was comparable to the parsed word comparison. The combination of enhanced gene ontology and parsed word methods gave the highest correlation coefficient of 0.16. The controlled vocabulary system of gene ontology was not sufficient to compare two annotated databases. The addition of gene ontology terms from translation libraries greatly increased the performance of these comparisons. In general, as the number of comparison terms increased the correlation coefficient increased. Future comparisons should include the enhanced gene ontology dataset in order to monitor the organization pertaining to formal nomenclature and the datasets generated from Word parsing can be used to monitor the degree of additional terms might be incorporated with translation libraries.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Department of Biology
Year
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Marpuri, ReddySalilaja
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Dr. Claire A. Rinehart (Director), Dr. Sigrid Jacobshagen, Dr. Cheryl Davis

Subjects

dc:subject × 9

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/94
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:digitalcommons.wku.edu:theses-1094

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Western Kentucky University
Base URL
digitalcommons.wku.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Marpuri, ReddySalilaja. Evaluation of Annotation Performances between Automated and Curated Databases of <i>E.COLI</i> Using the Correlation Coefficient. 2009. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/94