{"id":{"repo_id":"windsor","oai_identifier":"oai:uwindsor.scholaris.ca:20.500.14776/2309"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/windsor/oai:uwindsor.scholaris.ca:20.500.14776/2309","repository":{"repo_id":"windsor","name":"University of Windsor","base_url":"https://uwindsor.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Hemispheric Differences in Semantic Priming Examined Across Handedness Groups","abstract":"The present study investigates hemispheric differences in semantic priming across handedness groups. A lexical decision task was administered to 87 individuals, classified into handedness groups: consistent right-handers; consistent left-handers; and inconsistent-handers. Participants were presented with strongly- and nonassociated category members in a visual half-field semantic priming task. The hypothesis was that the dominant hemisphere would have an advantage for strongly-associated category members, and the nondominant hemisphere would have an advantage for nonassociated category members. This effect was expected to be determined by handedness, where consistent right-handers have left-hemisphere language dominance, consistent left-handers have right-hemisphere dominance, and inconsistent-handers have no hemispheric dominance. Although the expected interaction was not found, effects of SOA, word association, and visual field were consistent with previous findings. When handedness was re-classified by stated handedness, there was an association between handedness and visual field. The implications of these findings are discussed.","abstract_html":"The present study investigates hemispheric differences in semantic priming across handedness groups. A lexical decision task was administered to 87 individuals, classified into handedness groups: consistent right-handers; consistent left-handers; and inconsistent-handers. Participants were presented with strongly- and nonassociated category members in a visual half-field semantic priming task. The hypothesis was that the dominant hemisphere would have an advantage for strongly-associated category members, and the nondominant hemisphere would have an advantage for nonassociated category members. This effect was expected to be determined by handedness, where consistent right-handers have left-hemisphere language dominance, consistent left-handers have right-hemisphere dominance, and inconsistent-handers have no hemispheric dominance. Although the expected interaction was not found, effects of SOA, word association, and visual field were consistent with previous findings. When handedness was re-classified by stated handedness, there was an association between handedness and visual field. The implications of these findings are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Coppens, Andrea M."],"institution":"University of Windsor","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Abeare, Christopher A."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-01","date_published":"2010-01-01","updated_at":"2026-07-27T22:04:59Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_CA"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14776/2309","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Abeare, Christopher A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Coppens, Andrea M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-06-20 10:36"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2012-10-26 7:15","2025-06-20T14:36:05Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010-01-01"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Windsor"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_CA"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14776/2309"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The present study investigates hemispheric differences in semantic priming across handedness groups. A lexical decision task was administered to 87 individuals, classified into handedness groups: consistent right-handers; consistent left-handers; and inconsistent-handers. Participants were presented with strongly- and nonassociated category members in a visual half-field semantic priming task. The hypothesis was that the dominant hemisphere would have an advantage for strongly-associated category members, and the nondominant hemisphere would have an advantage for nonassociated category members. This effect was expected to be determined by handedness, where consistent right-handers have left-hemisphere language dominance, consistent left-handers have right-hemisphere dominance, and inconsistent-handers have no hemispheric dominance. Although the expected interaction was not found, effects of SOA, word association, and visual field were consistent with previous findings. When handedness was re-classified by stated handedness, there was an association between handedness and visual field. The implications of these findings are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Hemispheric Differences in Semantic Priming Examined Across Handedness Groups"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Abeare, Christopher A."],"dc:creator":["Coppens, Andrea M."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-06-20 10:36"],"dc:date.available":["2012-10-26 7:15","2025-06-20T14:36:05Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010-01-01"],"dc:description.abstract":["The present study investigates hemispheric differences in semantic priming across handedness groups. A lexical decision task was administered to 87 individuals, classified into handedness groups: consistent right-handers; consistent left-handers; and inconsistent-handers. Participants were presented with strongly- and nonassociated category members in a visual half-field semantic priming task. The hypothesis was that the dominant hemisphere would have an advantage for strongly-associated category members, and the nondominant hemisphere would have an advantage for nonassociated category members. This effect was expected to be determined by handedness, where consistent right-handers have left-hemisphere language dominance, consistent left-handers have right-hemisphere dominance, and inconsistent-handers have no hemispheric dominance. Although the expected interaction was not found, effects of SOA, word association, and visual field were consistent with previous findings. When handedness was re-classified by stated handedness, there was an association between handedness and visual field. The implications of these findings are discussed."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14776/2309"],"dc:language.iso":["en_CA"],"dc:rights":["http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"dc:title":["Hemispheric Differences in Semantic Priming Examined Across Handedness Groups"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Windsor"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T22:04:59Z"}