{"id":{"repo_id":"wfu","oai_identifier":"oai:wakespace.lib.wfu.edu:10339/38528"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wfu/oai:wakespace.lib.wfu.edu:10339/38528","repository":{"repo_id":"wfu","name":"Wake Forest University","base_url":"https://wakespace.lib.wfu.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT: THE NEED FOR MORAL PSYCHOLOGY IN BIOETHICS","abstract":"For many questions in bioethics, there are no right answers. Beauchamp and Childress point out: \"Conscientious and reasonable moral agents understandably disagree over moral priorities in circumstances of a contingent conflict of norms.\" These disagreements are sometimes contentious; and without cooperation, or at least tolerance, deliberations involving bioethics issues become ineffectual. Knowledge of moral psychology may facilitate agreement, or at a minimum encourage respect for opposing beliefs, by helping those who work with bioethics issues to understand how they form and reinforce their beliefs. Accordingly, this paper advocates for a greater inclusion of certain aspects of moral psychology in bioethics education and practice.","abstract_html":"For many questions in bioethics, there are no right answers. Beauchamp and Childress point out: "Conscientious and reasonable moral agents understandably disagree over moral priorities in circumstances of a contingent conflict of norms." These disagreements are sometimes contentious; and without cooperation, or at least tolerance, deliberations involving bioethics issues become ineffectual. Knowledge of moral psychology may facilitate agreement, or at a minimum encourage respect for opposing beliefs, by helping those who work with bioethics issues to understand how they form and reinforce their beliefs. Accordingly, this paper advocates for a greater inclusion of certain aspects of moral psychology in bioethics education and practice.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cardi, Michael"],"institution":"Wake Forest University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013","date_published":"2013","updated_at":"2026-07-27T22:01:33Z","subjects":["bioethics"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10339/38528","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cardi, Michael"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2013-06-06T21:19:25Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-06-06T08:30:09Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Wake Forest University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["bioethics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10339/38528"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["For many questions in bioethics, there are no right answers. Beauchamp and Childress point out: \"Conscientious and reasonable moral agents understandably disagree over moral priorities in circumstances of a contingent conflict of norms.\" These disagreements are sometimes contentious; and without cooperation, or at least tolerance, deliberations involving bioethics issues become ineffectual. Knowledge of moral psychology may facilitate agreement, or at a minimum encourage respect for opposing beliefs, by helping those who work with bioethics issues to understand how they form and reinforce their beliefs. Accordingly, this paper advocates for a greater inclusion of certain aspects of moral psychology in bioethics education and practice."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT: THE NEED FOR MORAL PSYCHOLOGY IN BIOETHICS"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Cardi, Michael"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2013-06-06T21:19:25Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-06-06T08:30:09Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013"],"dc:description.abstract":["For many questions in bioethics, there are no right answers. Beauchamp and Childress point out: \"Conscientious and reasonable moral agents understandably disagree over moral priorities in circumstances of a contingent conflict of norms.\" These disagreements are sometimes contentious; and without cooperation, or at least tolerance, deliberations involving bioethics issues become ineffectual. Knowledge of moral psychology may facilitate agreement, or at a minimum encourage respect for opposing beliefs, by helping those who work with bioethics issues to understand how they form and reinforce their beliefs. Accordingly, this paper advocates for a greater inclusion of certain aspects of moral psychology in bioethics education and practice."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10339/38528"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Wake Forest University"],"dc:subject":["bioethics"],"dc:title":["UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT: THE NEED FOR MORAL PSYCHOLOGY IN BIOETHICS"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T22:01:33Z"}