Back to results

University of Westminster

The Application of the Principle of Mutual Recognition in EU Criminal Law Matters - Internally and Externally vis-à-vis Pre-Accession Policy

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis analyses the principle of mutual recognition in EU criminal matters from two perspectives. It argues that the framework upon which this principle is built has become increasingly problematic and that the issues questioning its justification could undermine the results achieved in the pre-accession policy, where the values that support the mutual recognition framework are vigorously employed upon candidate countries. First, the thesis addresses the functioning and legitimacy of the principle of mutual recognition internally, in relation to the Union’s current Member States, with a particular focus on the most prominent mutual recognition instrument in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, the European Arrest Warrant. In recent years, the application of the principle of mutual recognition in this area, has become more challenging due to serious violations of the values which undermines mutual trust and the legitimate application of mutual recognition. Secondly, the thesis examines the principle of mutual recognition externally, vis-à-vis the EU’s pre-accession policy where key values for the application of mutual recognition have obtained a prominent place and should in principle build ground for the application of mutual recognition in criminal matters. The thesis analyses the two pillars upon which the concepts of Normative Power Europe rests: the EU’s normative identity and its normative influence to examine the principle of mutual recognition from both sides. It demonstrates that, internally, the non-commitment to the foundational values which lie at the heart of the EU’s normative identity are very vulnerable and the EU does not have the necessary influence to enforce compliance with the values. It is argued that this undermines the justifiability of the mutual recognition framework. In stark contrast with the internal situation, in the pre-accession policy the EU has strong tools to enforce transformation in the candidate countries to assure that they adhere to the EU’s foundational values and share its identity. However, the results achieved in the pre-accession policy can be easily undermined upon accession due to the problematic internal situation regarding the foundational values.

Degree

thesis:*
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
PhD thesis
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Westminster
Year dc:date.issued
2020

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Spreeuw, M.

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
oai:westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk:qzxxz
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk:qzxxz

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Westminster
Base URL
westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/oai2
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Spreeuw, M.. The Application of the Principle of Mutual Recognition in EU Criminal Law Matters - Internally and Externally vis-à-vis Pre-Accession Policy. PhD thesis thesis, University of Westminster, 2020. https://doi.org/10.34737/qzxxz