A comparative legal approach to mining rehabilitation funding schemes in South Africa and Western Australia
Despite the environmental and social challenges posed by historically abandoned mine sites to host communities, little effort has been made by the mining industry and governments to rehabilitate the environment. Mine rehabilitation projects are typically costly. In many instances, mining companies do not have a specific stance on funding sources for rehabilitation once the economically productive phase of the mine has concluded. Moreover, there is a lack of clearly assigned responsibilities and an absence of criteria and standards of rehabilitation for abandoned mines. South Africa is not exempt from the plague of abandoned mines because, for many years, environmental liabilities relating to mine closure have not been managed appropriately. As such, most mines have been simply abandoned. South Africa is believed to have around 6,000 deserted mines. Legislation has been enacted to address this issue. These include the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) of 1998, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) of 2002, and the Regulations pertaining to the Financial Provision for Prospecting, Exploration, Mining, or Production Operations, including National Environmental Management Act: Regulations: Financial provision for prospecting, exploration, mining or production operations (GNR1147). These legislative measures are designed to promote the polluter pays principle (PPP), which requires mines to bear the financial burden of environmental damage they cause.
Abandoned mine, Environment, Funding, Mining rehabilitation, South Africa
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations