{"id":{"repo_id":"wayne-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.wayne.edu:oa_dissertations-2412"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wayne-thes/oai:digitalcommons.wayne.edu:oa_dissertations-2412","repository":{"repo_id":"wayne-thes","name":"Wayne State University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Multiple Dalitz Plot Analysis At Cleo-C","abstract":"<p>Dalitz Plot analysis is a standard technique for the study of weak hadronic 3-body decays. This technique allows us to extract the relative amplitudes, phases, and fit fractions of the resonances that are the primary product of such decays. A Dalitz analysis is complicated by the presence of two or more interfering resonances that appear at the same place on the plot. In this analysis I attempt to resolve the $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ and $K^{0}_{s} f_{0}(980)$ in the decay of $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} K^{+} K^{-}$. Using the $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ resonance found in $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} \\pi^{0} \\eta$, I compare equating a resonance in an interfering decay channel with a non--interfering channel by fit fraction or amplitude. I use the 818 $pb^{-1}$ of CLEO-c data collected a $\\psi(3770)$ energies to perform the Dalitz plot analysis of $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} \\pi^{0} \\eta$ and $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} K^{+} K^{-}$. I find large fractions from both $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ and $K^{0}_{s} f_{0}(980)$ that destructively interfere to leave the $K^{0}_{s} \\phi(1020)$ as the dominant resonance on the plot.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Dalitz Plot analysis is a standard technique for the study of weak hadronic 3-body decays. This technique allows us to extract the relative amplitudes, phases, and fit fractions of the resonances that are the primary product of such decays. A Dalitz analysis is complicated by the presence of two or more interfering resonances that appear at the same place on the plot. In this analysis I attempt to resolve the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup></span> and <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> f<sub>0</sub>(980)</span> in the decay of <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">D<sup>0</sup> \\to K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></span>. Using the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup></span> resonance found in <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">D<sup>0</sup> \\to K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> &pi;<sup>0</sup> \\eta</span>, I compare equating a resonance in an interfering decay channel with a non--interfering channel by fit fraction or amplitude. I use the 818 <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">pb<sup>-1</sup></span> of CLEO-c data collected a $\\psi(3770)$ energies to perform the Dalitz plot analysis of <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">D<sup>0</sup> \\to K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> &pi;<sup>0</sup> \\eta</span> and <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">D<sup>0</sup> \\to K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> K<sup>+</sup> K<sup>-</sup></span>. I find large fractions from both <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> a<sub>0</sub>(980)<sup>0</sup></span> and <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> f<sub>0</sub>(980)</span> that destructively interfere to leave the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">K<sup>0</sup><sub>s</sub> \\phi(1020)</span> as the dominant resonance on the plot.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":true,"creators":["Smith, Mackenzie"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Open Access Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Physics and Astronomy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["David Cinabro"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2015-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:00:26Z","subjects":["Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1413","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["David Cinabro"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Smith, Mackenzie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Physics and Astronomy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Open Access Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1413"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Dalitz Plot analysis is a standard technique for the study of weak hadronic 3-body decays. This technique allows us to extract the relative amplitudes, phases, and fit fractions of the resonances that are the primary product of such decays. A Dalitz analysis is complicated by the presence of two or more interfering resonances that appear at the same place on the plot. In this analysis I attempt to resolve the $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ and $K^{0}_{s} f_{0}(980)$ in the decay of $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} K^{+} K^{-}$. Using the $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ resonance found in $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} \\pi^{0} \\eta$, I compare equating a resonance in an interfering decay channel with a non--interfering channel by fit fraction or amplitude. I use the 818 $pb^{-1}$ of CLEO-c data collected a $\\psi(3770)$ energies to perform the Dalitz plot analysis of $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} \\pi^{0} \\eta$ and $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} K^{+} K^{-}$. I find large fractions from both $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ and $K^{0}_{s} f_{0}(980)$ that destructively interfere to leave the $K^{0}_{s} \\phi(1020)$ as the dominant resonance on the plot.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Multiple Dalitz Plot Analysis At Cleo-C"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["David Cinabro"],"dc:creator":["Smith, Mackenzie"],"dc:date.available":["2016-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Dalitz Plot analysis is a standard technique for the study of weak hadronic 3-body decays. This technique allows us to extract the relative amplitudes, phases, and fit fractions of the resonances that are the primary product of such decays. A Dalitz analysis is complicated by the presence of two or more interfering resonances that appear at the same place on the plot. In this analysis I attempt to resolve the $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ and $K^{0}_{s} f_{0}(980)$ in the decay of $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} K^{+} K^{-}$. Using the $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ resonance found in $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} \\pi^{0} \\eta$, I compare equating a resonance in an interfering decay channel with a non--interfering channel by fit fraction or amplitude. I use the 818 $pb^{-1}$ of CLEO-c data collected a $\\psi(3770)$ energies to perform the Dalitz plot analysis of $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} \\pi^{0} \\eta$ and $D^{0} \\to K^{0}_{s} K^{+} K^{-}$. I find large fractions from both $K^{0}_{s} a_{0}(980)^{0}$ and $K^{0}_{s} f_{0}(980)$ that destructively interfere to leave the $K^{0}_{s} \\phi(1020)$ as the dominant resonance on the plot.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1413"],"dc:subject":["Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory"],"dc:title":["Multiple Dalitz Plot Analysis At Cleo-C"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Physics and Astronomy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Open Access Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:00:26Z"}