Dg And Hdg Methods For Curved Structures

<p>We introduce and analyze discontinuous Galerkin methods</p> <p>for a Naghdi type arch model. We prove that, when the numerical traces are properly chosen, the methods display optimal convergence uniformly with respect to the thickness of the arch. These methods are thus free from membrane and shear locking.</p> <p>We also prove that, when polynomials of degree $k$ are used,</p> <p>{\em all} the numerical traces superconverge with a rate of order</p> <p>h ^2k+1. </p> <p>Based on the superconvergent phenomenon and we show how to</p> <p>post-process them in an element-by-element fashion</p> <p>to obtain a far better approximation. Indeed, we prove that,</p> <p>if polynomials of degree k are used, the post-processed</p> <p>approximation converges with order 2k+1 in the L²-norm throughout the domain. This has to be contrasted with the fact that before post-processing, the approximation converges with order k+1 only. Moreover, we show that this superconvergence property does not deteriorate as the thickness of the arch becomes extremely small.</p> <p>Since the DG methods suffer from too many degree of freedoms we introduce and analyze a class of hybridizable</p> <p>discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) methods for Naghdi arches.</p> <p>The main feature of these methods is that they can be</p> <p>implemented in an efficient way through a hybridization</p> <p>procedure which reduces the globally coupled unknowns to</p> <p>approximations to the transverse and tangential displacement</p> <p>and bending moment at the element boundaries.</p> <p>The error analysis of the methods is based on the use</p> <p>of a projection especially designed to fit the structure</p> <p>of the numerical traces of the method. This property allows to prove</p> <p>in a very concise manner that the projection of the errors is</p> <p>bounded in terms of the distance between the exact solution and its projection.</p> <p>The study of the influence of the stabilization function</p> <p>on the approximation is then reduced to the study of how they affect</p> <p>the approximation properties of the projection in a single element.</p> <p>Consequently, we prove that HDG methods have the same result as DG methods.</p> <p>At the end of the thesis, we talk a little bit of shell problems.</p>

Name thesis:degree_name

Ph.D.

Level thesis:degree_level

Open Access Dissertation

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Mathematics

Year dc:date.available

2013

Author dc:creator

• Fan, Li

Contributors dc:contributor

• Zhimin Zhang
• Fatih Celiker

• beam
• DG
• HDG
• post-processing
• Mathematics

Repository record dc:identifier

https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/761

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:digitalcommons.wayne.edu:oa_dissertations-1760